Search

Displaying 1 - 7 of 7

Lesson
Proper due diligence on the capacity and commitment of government partner institutions like the COA to implementcomponents assigned to them should have been undertaken at appraisal to determine the risks and sustainability of involving them.

Project Number: 30320-013
Project Name: Agriculture Area Development Project
Report Date:
Lesson
Although this was the first agriculture investment project with MAWR the 3-year extension could have been avoided had the bidding documents been prepared, the management consultants and PMU staff contracted, and target farms identified earlier.

Project Number: 30313-012
Project Name: Agriculture Area Development
Report Date:
Lesson
Comprehensive and integrated projects can be successful. The success of this project can be attributed to the initial emphasis on the project management unit (PMU) obtaining a clear understanding of the project, an initial focus on process and procedures, minimum turnover of key PMU staff, good oversight by Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources (MAWR), good partnerships with other donors, and successful contracting and supervision of local civil works and agriculture extension firms.

Project Number: 30313-012
Project Name: Agriculture Area Development
Report Date:
Lesson
The project required close attention to many details, and it could have immediately and effectively performed many administrative tasks if the resident mission had had more capacity to assist the project.

Project Number: 30313-012
Project Name: Agriculture Area Development
Report Date:
Lesson
The project performance report (PPR) ratings were inconsistently applied over the period of project implementation. The ratings are 'satisfactory' and 'highly satisfactory' until November 2008, and are then rated 'at risk' and 'potential problem' for the month December 2008. The ratings then revert to 'satisfactory', before the project is again rated 'at risk' and 'potential problem' in December 2009.

Project Number: 31196-013
Project Name: Southern Agriculture Area Development Project
Report Date:
Lesson
The project design included 2,559 person-months of national consultants, approximately 35 people for each year of the 6 year implementation period. Despite the national consultant inputs appearing to be recruited through a firm/s on a quality- and cost-based selection basis, such a large requirement of consulting input could have potentially been difficult to effectively manage.

Project Number: 31196-013
Project Name: Southern Agriculture Area Development Project
Report Date:
Lesson
Clearer understanding between ADB and government of the key development objectives at the time of project design avoids costly changes in scope during project implementation.

Project Number: 31196-013
Project Name: Southern Agriculture Area Development Project
Report Date: