Skip to main content
Evaluation Lessons
Toggle navigation
Home
Countries
Afghanistan
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Bangladesh
Bhutan
Brunei Darussalam
Cambodia
China, People's Republic of
Cook Islands
Federated States of Micronesia
Fiji
Georgia
Hong Kong, China
India
Indonesia
Kazakhstan
Kiribati
Kyrgyz Republic
Lao People’s Democratic Republic
Malaysia
Maldives
Marshall Islands
Mongolia
Myanmar
Nauru
Nepal
Niue
Pakistan
Palau
Papua New Guinea
Philippines
Republic of Korea
Samoa
Singapore
Solomon Islands
Sri Lanka
Taipei,China
Tajikistan
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Tonga
Turkmenistan
Tuvalu
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Viet Nam
Australia
Japan
New Zealand
Sectors
Agriculture, natural resources, and rural development
Education
Energy
Finance
Health
Industry and trade
Information and communication technology
Multisector
Public sector management
Transport
Water and other urban infrastructure and services
Themes
Inclusive Economic Growth
Environmentally Sustainable Growth
Regional Integration
Private Sector Development
Governance and Capacity Development
Gender Equity and Mainstreaming
Knowledge Solutions
Partnerships
About
Home
Countries
Sectors
Themes
About
Search
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1
CSV
Lesson
The use of lump sum construction supervision contracts under conditions of frequent design changes is disadvantageous for the consultant and could jeopardize project implementation. The use of a lump sum contract between the EA and consultant for this project was not suitable. Lump sum contracts work well when tasks are precisely defined and the risks to both parties are well understood. In this case, the project had frequent design changes that resulted in extended discussions on the variations and severe implementation delays.
Project Number:
41192-013
Project Name:
Regional Logistics Development Project
Report Date:
19 Aug 2022
CSV