Design and monitoring frameworks (DMFs) need to have all the necessary Indicators as well as flexible timelines to effectively be used as planning, monitoring, and evaluation tools. Given the breadth of the program, the DMF should have included at least one indicator for each reform area to better monitor the outcome and long-term impact of key policy actions. Although three new outcome Indicators were included in subprogram 3, these mainly covered financial inclusion and nonperforming loans. Reform areas such as affordable housing pension coverage, secondary market activity, and the participation of small businesses were not sufficiently covered. Achievement timelines could also have been revised given the unanticipated external disruptions.
Financial Market Development Program
(Subprograms 1; 2; and 3)