Search

Displaying 1 - 15 of 19

Lesson
It is important to include relevant indicators to meaningfully assess the project’s results. At the outcome level, an indicator of transmission capacity in megavolt amperes and actual energy transmitted in megawatt- hours would have been more appropriate. The selection of indicators must consider results that are attributable directly to the project. At the impact level, indicators such as household access to electricity are also relevant to measure the project’s impact on development.

Project Number: 45224-003
Project Name: Rajasthan Renewable Energy Transmission Investment Program (Tranche 1)
Report Date:
Lesson
Well-developed monitoring framework, with logically defined target indicators, can assist the project in measuring its achievements and results objectively

Project Number: 42039-034
Project Name: Power Transmission Investment Program - Tranche 1
Report Date:
Lesson
Target outputs need to be specific and measurable to enable effective monitoring and supervision during implementation and reliable performance evaluation at completion.

Project Number: 43150-022
Project Name: Regional Power Transmission Project
Report Date:
Lesson
The need for some project outputs can decline over time, for several valid reasons. While it is important to avoid unnecessary investments, it is also important to record such changes to note these reasons and revise the design and monitoring framework on time.

Project Number: 44192-016
Project Name: SASEC Second Bangladesh-India Electrical Grid Interconnection Project
Report Date:
Lesson
If the project outputs considered in the project designs are not fully assigned to the implementing agency, delivery of those outputs is unlikely. Therefore, all outputs considered at project appraisal should be identified with an implementation arrangement at the design stage and validated during implementation.

Project Number: 44192-016
Project Name: SASEC Second Bangladesh-India Electrical Grid Interconnection Project
Report Date:
Lesson
Often, not enough consideration is given to developing DMF impacts and outcomes that can be easily assessed in post-project evaluations.

Project Number: 44198-013
Project Name: Power Sector Rehabilitation Project
Report Date:
Lesson
Supply interruption frequency is a better measure of power supply reliability for grid enhancement projects than the number of outages, although it needs to be qualified if there are shortages in power generation.

Project Number: 38456-033
Project Name: Power Distribution Enhancement Investment Program—Tranche 3
Report Date:
Lesson
The project lacked focus as it included interventions in several key areas; a less ambitious results framework and reasonable implementation schedule would have brought more success.

Project Number: 39419-013
Project Name: Clean Energy and Access Improvement Project
Report Date:
Lesson
Economic internal rate of return and financial internal rate of return calculations need to follow the guidelines of ADB regarding methodology.

Project Number: 39630-023, 39630-033
Project Name: National Power Grid Development Investment Program (Tranches 1 and 2)
Report Date:
Lesson
Poorly designed DMF indicators and targets, and the lack of timely data collection have undermined ADB’s ability to correctly document the impact of this project.

Project Number: 40075-023
Project Name: National Trade Corridor Highway Investment Program (Tranche 1)
Report Date:
Lesson
Utilities need to understand the impact of loss reduction on their finances, to take appropriate investment decisions, particularly when differentiating between technical and commercial losses.

Project Number: 32298-013, 32298-073
Project Name: Madhya Pradesh Power Sector Investment Program (Tranche 6 and Multitranche Financing Facility)
Report Date:
Lesson
Considering the large economic and financial benefits of loss-reduction projects in distribution grids, it is necessary to carry out a more thorough assessment than what is usually provided in completion reports.

Project Number: 32298-013, 32298-073
Project Name: Madhya Pradesh Power Sector Investment Program (Tranche 6 and Multitranche Financing Facility)
Report Date:
Lesson
A methodology should be developed and incorporated in ADB documents, when measuring economic impacts of multi-project programs.

Project Number: 32298-013, 32298-073
Project Name: Madhya Pradesh Power Sector Investment Program (Tranche 6 and Multitranche Financing Facility)
Report Date:
Lesson
The practice of using a weighted average EIRR, which is inaccurate as economic benefits are not directly proportional to investment volumes and to the other metrics used for weighting due to the interrelated benefits among projects, should be discontinued in ex-ante and ex-post evaluations of programs supported by MFF.

Project Number: 32298-013, 32298-073
Project Name: Madhya Pradesh Power Sector Investment Program (Tranche 6 and Multitranche Financing Facility)
Report Date:
Lesson
It is difficult to establish accurate cost estimates due to the long MFF implementation timelines and the value of flexibility that is inherent in the MFF modality.

Project Number: 32298-013, 32298-073
Project Name: Madhya Pradesh Power Sector Investment Program (Tranche 6 and Multitranche Financing Facility)
Report Date: