Skip to main content
Evaluation Lessons
Toggle navigation
Home
Countries
Afghanistan
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Bangladesh
Bhutan
Brunei Darussalam
Cambodia
China, People's Republic of
Cook Islands
Federated States of Micronesia
Fiji
Georgia
Hong Kong, China
India
Indonesia
Kazakhstan
Kiribati
Kyrgyz Republic
Lao People’s Democratic Republic
Malaysia
Maldives
Marshall Islands
Mongolia
Myanmar
Nauru
Nepal
Niue
Pakistan
Palau
Papua New Guinea
Philippines
Republic of Korea
Samoa
Singapore
Solomon Islands
Sri Lanka
Taipei,China
Tajikistan
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Tonga
Turkmenistan
Tuvalu
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Viet Nam
Australia
Japan
New Zealand
Sectors
Agriculture, natural resources, and rural development
Education
Energy
Finance
Health
Industry and trade
Information and communication technology
Multisector
Public sector management
Transport
Water and other urban infrastructure and services
Themes
Inclusive Economic Growth
Environmentally Sustainable Growth
Regional Integration
Private Sector Development
Governance and Capacity Development
Gender Equity and Mainstreaming
Knowledge Solutions
Partnerships
About
Home
Countries
Sectors
Themes
About
Search
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1
Lesson
In designing the design and monitoring frameworks (DMFs) for the COVID-19 Pandemic Response Option (CPRO), the approach was to extract aspects of the government's response plan that reflected ADB priorities and offered points of engagement with the government, and to restrict the number of indicators and targets so as not to burden the government. However, an unintended consequence is that this can weaken the logic and evidence base of the DMF, making it difficult to satisfactorily demonstrate the achievement of the program outcome.
Project Number:
54193-001
Project Name:
COVID-19 Active Response and Expenditure Support Program
Report Date:
06 Jun 2023