Skip to main content
Evaluation Lessons
  • Home
  • Countries
    • Afghanistan
    • Armenia
    • Azerbaijan
    • Bangladesh
    • Bhutan
    • Brunei Darussalam
    • Cambodia
    • China, People's Republic of
    • Cook Islands
    • Federated States of Micronesia
    • Fiji
    • Georgia
    • Hong Kong, China
    • India
    • Indonesia
    • Kazakhstan
    • Kiribati
    • Kyrgyz Republic
    • Lao People’s Democratic Republic
    • Malaysia
    • Maldives
    • Marshall Islands
    • Mongolia
    • Myanmar
    • Nauru
    • Nepal
    • Niue
    • Pakistan
    • Palau
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Philippines
    • Republic of Korea
    • Samoa
    • Singapore
    • Solomon Islands
    • Sri Lanka
    • Taipei,China
    • Tajikistan
    • Thailand
    • Timor-Leste
    • Tonga
    • Turkmenistan
    • Tuvalu
    • Uzbekistan
    • Vanuatu
    • Viet Nam
    • Australia
    • Japan
    • New Zealand
  • Sectors
    • Agriculture, natural resources, and rural development
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Finance
    • Health
    • Industry and trade
    • Information and communication technology
    • Multisector
    • Public sector management
    • Transport
    • Water and other urban infrastructure and services
  • Themes
    • Inclusive Economic Growth
    • Environmentally Sustainable Growth
    • Regional Integration
    • Private Sector Development
    • Governance and Capacity Development
    • Gender Equity and Mainstreaming
    • Knowledge Solutions
    • Partnerships
  • About
  • Home
  • Countries
  • Sectors
  • Themes
  • About

Search

Displaying 361 - 362 of 362

Lesson
The program assumed that by implementing the policy framework the government would have the tools and capacity to implement the full Pasig River Development Plan (PRDP), leading to the overall objective of improving the Pasig River water quality to class C level by 2014. However, the outputs of the policy loan covered only part of the implementation activities of the PRDP, and therefore it should have been clear from the start that the overall objective was not attainable.

Project Number: 30308-013
Project Name: Pasig River Environmental Management and Rehabilitation Sector Development Program
Report Date: 12 Jan 2010

Lesson
The program required the cooperation of a large number of government agencies, while responsibility for implementation was given to the newly established Pasig River Rehabilitation Commission, without a well-established mandate or political influence. Without high-level political support, coordination became difficult and program outcomes were not achieved. When the responsibility for project implementation was delegated to sector agencies, it became more effective.

Project Number: 30308-013
Project Name: Pasig River Environmental Management and Rehabilitation Sector Development Program
Report Date: 12 Jan 2010

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 17
  • Page 18
  • Page 19
  • Page 20
  • Page 21
  • Page 22
  • Page 23
  • Page 24
  • Current page 25

Content type

  • Lesson (362)

Countries

  • (-) Philippines (362)
  • Afghanistan (264)
  • Armenia (230)
  • Azerbaijan (256)
  • Bangladesh (641)
  • Bhutan (310)
  • Brunei Darussalam (151)
  • Cambodia (471)
  • China, People's Republic of (1031)
  • Cook Islands (164)
  • Federated States of Micronesia (188)
  • Fiji (176)
  • Georgia (254)
  • Hong Kong, China (103)
  • India (1039)
  • Indonesia (530)
  • Kazakhstan (276)
  • Kiribati (177)
  • Kyrgyz Republic (296)
  • Lao People’s Democratic Republic (497)
  • Malaysia (151)
  • Maldives (233)
  • Marshall Islands (161)
  • Mongolia (434)
  • Myanmar (250)
  • Nauru (162)
  • Nepal (552)
  • Niue (103)
  • Pakistan (556)
  • Palau (158)
  • Papua New Guinea (272)
  • Republic of Korea (151)
  • Samoa (199)
  • Singapore (151)
  • Solomon Islands (226)
  • Sri Lanka (404)
  • Taipei,China (103)
  • Tajikistan (280)
  • Thailand (224)
  • Timor-Leste (209)
  • Tonga (222)
  • Turkmenistan (164)
  • Tuvalu (168)
  • Uzbekistan (439)
  • Vanuatu (174)
  • Viet Nam (726)
  • Australia (22)
  • Japan (48)
  • New Zealand (22)

Sectors

  • Public sector management (113)
  • Agriculture, natural resources, and rural development (52)
  • Finance (52)
  • Industry and trade (36)
  • Transport (31)
  • Health (30)
  • Education (28)
  • Energy (22)
  • Water and other urban infrastructure and services (22)
  • Multisector (20)
  • Information and communication technology (13)

Themes

  • Inclusive Economic Growth (138)
  • Environmentally Sustainable Growth (44)
  • Regional Integration (22)
  • Private Sector Development (56)
  • Governance and Capacity Development (113)
  • Gender Equity and Mainstreaming (95)
  • Knowledge Solutions (33)
  • Partnerships (59)

Report Year

  • 2024 (17)
  • 2023 (11)
  • 2022 (12)
  • 2021 (48)
  • 2020 (127)
  • 2019 (12)
  • 2018 (5)
  • 2017 (11)
  • 2016 (14)
  • 2015 (9)
  • 2014 (18)
  • 2013 (5)
  • 2012 (17)
  • 2011 (27)
  • 2010 (29)

Report Source

  • Self-evaluation (137)
  • Technical assistance completion reports validation (75)
  • Technical assistance completion reports (74)
  • Validation of self-evaluation (48)
  • Independent project evaluation (28)

Report Rating

  • Highly successful (38)
  • Less than successful (69)
  • Successful (96)
  • Unsuccessful (13)

Applicability

  • Country-level (2)
  • Program-level (18)
  • Project-level (15)
  • Results framework and methodology level (12)
  • Sector-level (12)

Topics

  • Behavioral change requirements (1)
  • Capacity development (3)
  • Country context (1)
  • Data availability and baselines (3)
  • Design and/or planning (23)
  • EA/IA capacity assessment, Implementation arrangement (2)
  • Economic (1)
  • Environment (1)
  • Environmental (1)
  • Epidemics (1)
  • Finance and financial aspects (1)
  • Financial (2)
  • Gender (1)
  • Implementation and/or Delivery (24)
  • Indicators (3)
  • Institutional (4)
  • Instutional (1)
  • Knowledge building (20)
  • Management (staffing, including consultants) (11)
  • Methodologies / approaches (16)
  • Methologies / approaches (1)
  • Modality (5)
  • Monitoring and evaluation (9)
  • Multitranche financing facility (MFF) (1)
  • New technologies (2)
  • Organizational capacity (1)
  • Other (5)
  • Others (1)
  • Partnership (and cofinancing) (15)
  • Poject design (1)
  • Policy and reform (8)
  • Political (1)
  • Post-TA financial resources (11)
  • Procurement (1)
  • Project design (21)
  • Replication and scaling Up (17)
  • Reporting and supervision (1)
  • Sector issues (3)
  • Skilled human resources (1)
  • Social (2)
  • Stakeholder engagement (9)
  • Stakeholder participation (14)
  • Stakeholder selection (2)
  • Technical (11)
  • Time allocation or task sequencing (1)

Subscribe to our mailing list

6 ADB Avenue,
Mandaluyong City
1550, Metro Manila,
Philippines

 

Phone: +632 632 4444
Fax: +632 636 2444

Other ADB Websites

ADB Compliance Review Panel
Asia Pathways (ADBI Blog)
Asia Regional Integration Center
Asian Bonds Online
Asian Development Blog
Open Access Repository
Statistical Database System

IED Social Media

LinkedIn

Twitter

YouTube

©2024 Independent Evaluation - Asian Development Bank

Footer

  • About