Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Countries
    • Afghanistan
    • Armenia
    • Azerbaijan
    • Bangladesh
    • Bhutan
    • Brunei Darussalam
    • Cambodia
    • China, People's Republic of
    • Cook Islands
    • Federated States of Micronesia
    • Fiji
    • Georgia
    • Hong Kong, China
    • India
    • Indonesia
    • Kazakhstan
    • Kiribati
    • Kyrgyz Republic
    • Lao People's Democratic Republic
    • Malaysia
    • Maldives
    • Marshall Islands
    • Mongolia
    • Myanmar
    • Nauru
    • Nepal
    • Niue
    • Pakistan
    • Palau
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Philippines
    • Republic of Korea
    • Samoa
    • Singapore
    • Solomon Islands
    • Sri Lanka
    • Taipei,China
    • Tajikistan
    • Thailand
    • Timor-Leste
    • Tonga
    • Turkmenistan
    • Tuvalu
    • Uzbekistan
    • Vanuatu
    • Viet Nam
    • Australia
    • Japan
    • New Zealand
  • Sectors
    • Agriculture, natural resources, and rural development
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Finance
    • Health
    • Industry and trade
    • Information and communication technology
    • Multisector
    • Public sector management
    • Transport
    • Water and other urban infrastructure and services
  • Themes
    • Inclusive Economic Growth
    • Environmentally Sustainable Growth
    • Regional Integration
    • Private Sector Development
    • Governance and Capacity Development
    • Gender Equity and Mainstreaming
    • Knowledge Solutions
    • Partnerships
  • About

Search

Displaying 361 - 362 of 362

Lesson
The program required the cooperation of a large number of government agencies, while responsibility for implementation was given to the newly established Pasig River Rehabilitation Commission, without a well-established mandate or political influence. Without high-level political support, coordination became difficult and program outcomes were not achieved. When the responsibility for project implementation was delegated to sector agencies, it became more effective.

Project Number: 30308-013
Project Name: Pasig River Environmental Management and Rehabilitation Sector Development Program
Report Date: 12 Jan 2010

Lesson
The program was overly ambitious in its scope and in its implementation structure. Only after modification of the scope and implementation arrangements was progress made. This could have been avoided, had a proper risk assessment and risk mitigation plan been prepared, based on the lessons learned from the previous program. Although the Pasig River Development Plan provided a good framework for the implementation of environmental improvement projects, more and longer-term assistance is required to establish the institutional setting for its effective implementation.

Project Number: 30308-013
Project Name: Pasig River Environmental Management and Rehabilitation Sector Development Program
Report Date: 12 Jan 2010

Pagination

  • « First First page
  • ‹‹ Previous page
  • …
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25

Content type

  • Lesson (362)

Countries

  • (-) Philippines (362)
  • Afghanistan (264)
  • Armenia (230)
  • Azerbaijan (256)
  • Bangladesh (641)
  • Bhutan (310)
  • Brunei Darussalam (151)
  • Cambodia (471)
  • China, People's Republic of (1031)
  • Cook Islands (164)
  • Federated States of Micronesia (188)
  • Fiji (176)
  • Georgia (254)
  • Hong Kong, China (103)
  • India (1039)
  • Indonesia (530)
  • Kazakhstan (276)
  • Kiribati (177)
  • Kyrgyz Republic (296)
  • Lao People’s Democratic Republic (497)
  • Malaysia (151)
  • Maldives (233)
  • Marshall Islands (161)
  • Mongolia (434)
  • Myanmar (250)
  • Nauru (162)
  • Nepal (552)
  • Niue (103)
  • Pakistan (556)
  • Palau (158)
  • Papua New Guinea (272)
  • Republic of Korea (151)
  • Samoa (199)
  • Singapore (151)
  • Solomon Islands (226)
  • Sri Lanka (404)
  • Taipei,China (103)
  • Tajikistan (280)
  • Thailand (224)
  • Timor-Leste (209)
  • Tonga (222)
  • Turkmenistan (164)
  • Tuvalu (168)
  • Uzbekistan (439)
  • Vanuatu (174)
  • Viet Nam (726)
  • Australia (22)
  • Japan (48)
  • New Zealand (22)

Sectors

  • Public sector management (113)
  • Agriculture, natural resources, and rural development (52)
  • Finance (52)
  • Industry and trade (36)
  • Transport (31)
  • Health (30)
  • Education (28)
  • Energy (22)
  • Water and other urban infrastructure and services (22)
  • Multisector (20)
  • Information and communication technology (13)

Themes

  • Inclusive Economic Growth (138)
  • Environmentally Sustainable Growth (44)
  • Regional Integration (22)
  • Private Sector Development (56)
  • Governance and Capacity Development (113)
  • Gender Equity and Mainstreaming (95)
  • Knowledge Solutions (33)
  • Partnerships (59)

Report Year

  • 2024 (17)
  • 2023 (11)
  • 2022 (12)
  • 2021 (48)
  • 2020 (127)
  • 2019 (12)
  • 2018 (5)
  • 2017 (11)
  • 2016 (14)
  • 2015 (9)
  • 2014 (18)
  • 2013 (5)
  • 2012 (17)
  • 2011 (27)
  • 2010 (29)

Report Source

  • Self-evaluation (137)
  • Technical assistance completion reports validation (75)
  • Technical assistance completion reports (74)
  • Validation of self-evaluation (48)
  • Independent project evaluation (28)

Report Rating

  • Highly successful (38)
  • Less than successful (69)
  • Successful (96)
  • Unsuccessful (13)

Applicability

  • Country-level (2)
  • Program-level (18)
  • Project-level (15)
  • Results framework and methodology level (12)
  • Sector-level (12)

Topics

  • Behavioral change requirements (1)
  • Capacity development (3)
  • Country context (1)
  • Data availability and baselines (3)
  • Design and/or planning (23)
  • EA/IA capacity assessment, Implementation arrangement (2)
  • Economic (1)
  • Environment (1)
  • Environmental (1)
  • Epidemics (1)
  • Finance and financial aspects (1)
  • Financial (2)
  • Gender (1)
  • Implementation and/or Delivery (24)
  • Indicators (3)
  • Institutional (4)
  • Instutional (1)
  • Knowledge building (20)
  • Management (staffing, including consultants) (11)
  • Methodologies / approaches (16)
  • Methologies / approaches (1)
  • Modality (5)
  • Monitoring and evaluation (9)
  • Multitranche financing facility (MFF) (1)
  • New technologies (2)
  • Organizational capacity (1)
  • Other (5)
  • Others (1)
  • Partnership (and cofinancing) (15)
  • Poject design (1)
  • Policy and reform (8)
  • Political (1)
  • Post-TA financial resources (11)
  • Procurement (1)
  • Project design (21)
  • Replication and scaling Up (17)
  • Reporting and supervision (1)
  • Sector issues (3)
  • Skilled human resources (1)
  • Social (2)
  • Stakeholder engagement (9)
  • Stakeholder participation (14)
  • Stakeholder selection (2)
  • Technical (11)
  • Time allocation or task sequencing (1)

Subscribe to our mailing list

6 ADB Avenue,
Mandaluyong City
1550, Metro Manila,
Philippines

 

Phone: +632 632 4444
Fax: +632 636 2444

Other ADB Websites

ADB Compliance Review Panel
Asia Pathways (ADBI Blog)
Asia Regional Integration Center
Asian Bonds Online
Asian Development Blog
Open Access Repository
Statistical Database System

IED Social Media

LinkedIn

X

YouTube

©2026 Independent Evaluation - Asian Development Bank

Footer

  • About
  • Home
  • Countries
  • Sectors
  • Themes
  • About