Search

Displaying 106 - 120 of 223

Lesson
Agreed. Furthermore, the UNESCAP previously piloted a TTFMM in South Asia. The approach was replicated under this TA project for Output c. The application of well-executed methodologies used in other comparable regions is a positive example of knowledge sharing and replication. It is also important to adopt the approach piloted in other region by fully customizing the approaches that are applicable to the region of the interest, which for this TA project was the Pacific region.

Project Number: 46502-001
Project Name: Trade and Transport Facilitation in the Pacific
Report Date:
Lesson
The lifting of regulatory standards, the development of a project pipeline and the development of strategic trade and transport facilitation implementation plans help to direct government focus for budget allocation. Donors and the private sector are motivated to invest in areas where strategic development has already commenced, and where strategic plans are in place that have a coordinated long-term focus, and which can clearly demonstrate positive project outcomes.

Project Number: 46502-001
Project Name: Trade and Transport Facilitation in the Pacific
Report Date:
Lesson
This is a description, not a lesson for a future TA project. The change in scope dropped tasks connected with project preparation, so the likelihood of matching the ambition of the outcome was not realistic. This validation offers the following lesson: It is important to match the ambition of TA project objectives with resources available and borrower capacity. ADB’s value added is in the dialogue and the provision of independent recommendations, based on best practices, which raises the capacity of clients.

Project Number: 42417-045
Project Name: Vertical Mobility and Safety Improvement
Report Date:
Lesson
A lesson could be formulated as: It is important to assess the risk of priority changes by a TA client, and the possible implications, especially if a government (and thereby the client) change may occur during the implementation of the TA project.

Project Number: 42417-045
Project Name: Vertical Mobility and Safety Improvement
Report Date:
Lesson
This is a description of what was done, not a lesson for a future TA project. . A lesson is: Significant changes in scope requires careful consideration of the impact on the effective and efficient use of the TA project resources.

Project Number: 42417-045
Project Name: Vertical Mobility and Safety Improvement
Report Date:
Lesson
Again, this is a description of what was done, not a lesson for a future TA project. In addition, as a lesson, it is somewhat weak since it is commonly understood that participants benefit from workshops by experts. A lesson could be formulated as: Although a TA objective may not be achieved, TA products (e.g., analytical reports) may still be exploited in the future.

Project Number: 42417-045
Project Name: Vertical Mobility and Safety Improvement
Report Date:
Lesson
This is a description of what was done, not a lesson for a future TA project. This validation offers the following lesson: Active engagement with appropriate stakeholders adds value to TA project outputs and ADB standing as convener and facilitator.

Project Number: 42417-045
Project Name: Vertical Mobility and Safety Improvement
Report Date:
Lesson
This is a description of what has happened, not a lesson for a future TA project. Refer to lesson under Knowledge building.

Project Number: 42417-045
Project Name: Vertical Mobility and Safety Improvement
Report Date:
Lesson
This is a description, not a lesson for a future TA project.

Project Number: 42417-045
Project Name: Vertical Mobility and Safety Improvement
Report Date:
Lesson
This is a description, not a lesson for a future TA project.

Project Number: 42417-045
Project Name: Vertical Mobility and Safety Improvement
Report Date:
Lesson
Agree. However, such alignment was a necessary, but insufficient prerequisite to developing relevant and useful knowledge products and policy recommendations. The TCR could have more thoroughly discussed the TA design, with particular attention to the DMF results chain (refer to Relevance section for details). It could also have further discussed on the unattained ambitious outcome performance indicators from the perspective of DMF design.

Project Number: 48460-001
Project Name: Promoting the Decisive Role of Market in Resource Allocation
Report Date:
Lesson
A lesson could be identified here: The outcome indicator(s) of a policy and advisory TA shall be deliberately designed to establish a reasonable cause–effect relationship between outputs and outcome, and, therefore,ensure a logical appropriateness and continuum of the DMF results chain. It isimportant that the outcome indicator(s) reflect the immediate and direct benefits of application of TA outputs, rather than aim to address a high-level development issue, which would bedisproportionately ambitious and complex for a TA.

Project Number: 48460-001
Project Name: Promoting the Decisive Role of Market in Resource Allocation
Report Date:
Lesson
The TCR could also have augmented its analysis in addition to listing the titles of the consultants’ reports. For a policy and advisory TA with the target of developing policy analysis for government agencies’ reference and consideration the TA’s findings and policy recommendations should offer inspiring perspectives and insights that are addition to what, in the absence of the TA, would have been available to and well known by the targeted audience. To this end, the TCR should have adequately discussed the reports’ contents and quality.

Project Number: 48460-001
Project Name: Promoting the Decisive Role of Market in Resource Allocation
Report Date:
Lesson
The TCR could have provided more details in its sections about conduct of activities, implementation arrangements, and assessment ratings to substantiate this lesson. While the TA’s extension by 1 year and 9 months could be an indicator of inadequate coordination, more descriptive and analytical details should have been provided to make this lesson evidence_x005F_x0002_based and relevant.

Project Number: 48460-001
Project Name: Promoting the Decisive Role of Market in Resource Allocation
Report Date:
Lesson
The TCR should have provided more details about consultants and their work. The TA fund was underutilized, with the consultants’ costs reduced from $370,000 to $228,000.Substantial TA outputs were also under-delivered. The TCR should have investigated and discussed why this was the case. Meanwhile, it would have been useful to also discuss the performance of ADB staff, the executing agency, and the implementing agency, in the context of under-delivered TA outputs.

Project Number: 48460-001
Project Name: Promoting the Decisive Role of Market in Resource Allocation
Report Date: