Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Countries
    • Afghanistan
    • Armenia
    • Azerbaijan
    • Bangladesh
    • Bhutan
    • Brunei Darussalam
    • Cambodia
    • China, People's Republic of
    • Cook Islands
    • Federated States of Micronesia
    • Fiji
    • Georgia
    • Hong Kong, China
    • India
    • Indonesia
    • Kazakhstan
    • Kiribati
    • Kyrgyz Republic
    • Lao People's Democratic Republic
    • Malaysia
    • Maldives
    • Marshall Islands
    • Mongolia
    • Myanmar
    • Nauru
    • Nepal
    • Niue
    • Pakistan
    • Palau
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Philippines
    • Republic of Korea
    • Samoa
    • Singapore
    • Solomon Islands
    • Sri Lanka
    • Taipei,China
    • Tajikistan
    • Thailand
    • Timor-Leste
    • Tonga
    • Turkmenistan
    • Tuvalu
    • Uzbekistan
    • Vanuatu
    • Viet Nam
    • Australia
    • Japan
    • New Zealand
  • Sectors
    • Agriculture, natural resources, and rural development
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Finance
    • Health
    • Industry and trade
    • Information and communication technology
    • Multisector
    • Public sector management
    • Transport
    • Water and other urban infrastructure and services
  • Themes
    • Inclusive Economic Growth
    • Environmentally Sustainable Growth
    • Regional Integration
    • Private Sector Development
    • Governance and Capacity Development
    • Gender Equity and Mainstreaming
    • Knowledge Solutions
    • Partnerships
  • About

Search

Displaying 16 - 16 of 16

Lesson
Purposeful selection of outcome Indicators that are easily and regularly monitored is critical in crisis response projects. There is a high level of uncertainty surrounding the duration and impact of a crisis. Thus, choosing outcome Indicators that provide timely and crucial information on the progress of the crisis and the impact of policy measures can help manage a crisis, as it allows to quickly introduce new measures when the situation worsens.

Project Number: 54184-001
Project Name: COVID-19 Active Response and Expenditure Support Program
Report Date: 19 Dec 2022

Pagination

  • « First First page
  • ‹‹ Previous page
  • 1
  • 2

Content type

  • Lesson (16)

Countries

  • Azerbaijan (2)
  • Cambodia (1)
  • China, People's Republic of (2)
  • Mongolia (3)
  • Nepal (1)
  • Papua New Guinea (2)
  • Solomon Islands (2)
  • Thailand (2)
  • Tonga (1)

Sectors

  • (-) Health (16)
    • Nutrition (2)
    • Health system development (10)
    • Disease control of communicable disease (9)
    • Health insurance and subsidized health programs (2)
    • Health sector development and reform (3)
  • Public sector management (9)
  • Education (4)
  • Agriculture, natural resources, and rural development (2)
  • Finance (2)
  • Industry and trade (2)

Themes

  • Inclusive Economic Growth (11)
  • Regional Integration (4)
  • Governance and Capacity Development (11)
  • Gender Equity and Mainstreaming (11)
  • Partnerships (6)

Report Year

  • 2024 (3)
  • 2023 (12)
  • 2022 (1)

Report Source

  • Self-evaluation (12)
  • Validation of self-evaluation (4)

Report Rating

  • Highly successful (1)
  • Less than successful (1)
  • Successful (14)

Applicability

  • Country-level (2)
  • Project-level (3)
  • Results framework and methodology level (4)

Topics

  • ADB policy/ procedural adjustments (1)
  • Air quality improvements (1)
  • Beneficiary targeting (4)
  • Beneficiary targetting (1)
  • Budgeting (3)
  • Capacity development (7)
  • Commitment and leadership (1)
  • Coordination and engagement (1)
  • Country context (17)
  • COVID-19 , CPRO (1)
  • COVID-19 - Kyrgyz Republic (1)
  • COVID-19, CPRO (3)
  • Crosscutting issues and themes (1)
  • Data availability and baselines (15)
  • Design and/or planning (6)
  • Disaster and Emergency Response (1)
  • Disasters (8)
  • Donor coordination (1)
  • Economic (1)
  • Emergency assistance (7)
  • Environmental (1)
  • Epidemics (30)
  • Finance and financial aspects (5)
  • Finance and financial resources (1)
  • Financial (3)
  • Gender (12)
  • Human development programs (1)
  • Implementation and/or Delivery (2)
  • Institutional (14)
  • Inter and intra government relations (1)
  • Knowledge building (1)
  • Leadership and commitment (1)
  • Methodologies / approaches (30)
  • Methodologies and approaches (2)
  • Modality (5)
  • Monitoring and evaluation (35)
  • Natural disasters (7)
  • Organizational capacity (4)
  • Others (4)
  • Overambitious objectives (1)
  • Overambitious targets (1)
  • Pandemics (4)
  • Partnership (and cofinancing) (2)
  • PBLs (1)
  • Policy-based lending (PBL) (1)
  • Policy and reform (6)
  • Political (1)
  • Post-program partnership framework (PPPF) (1)
  • Procurement (4)
  • Project design (47)
  • Project management (10)
  • Project reporting (2)
  • RBL (1)
  • RBL, Monitoring and evaluation - RBL (1)
  • Reform programs (1)
  • Replication and scaling Up (1)
  • Reporting and supervision (1)
  • Results-based lending (RBL) (1)
  • Roles and responsibilities (1)
  • Roles and responsibilitieslInstitutional (1)
  • Sector issues (4)
  • Skilled human resources (1)
  • Social (3)
  • Staff turnover (5)
  • Staff turnovover (1)
  • Stakeholder engagement (27)
  • Stakeholder engagement, Coordination and engagement (1)
  • Stakeholder selection (3)
  • TA (2)
  • Technical (2)
  • Unsupportive legal and regulatory processes (1)
  • … (1)
  • (-) Indicators (16)

Subscribe to our mailing list

6 ADB Avenue,
Mandaluyong City
1550, Metro Manila,
Philippines

 

Phone: +632 632 4444
Fax: +632 636 2444

Other ADB Websites

ADB Compliance Review Panel
Asia Pathways (ADBI Blog)
Asia Regional Integration Center
Asian Bonds Online
Asian Development Blog
Open Access Repository
Statistical Database System

IED Social Media

LinkedIn

X

YouTube

©2026 Independent Evaluation - Asian Development Bank

Footer

  • About
  • Home
  • Countries
  • Sectors
  • Themes
  • About