Search

Displaying 1 - 5 of 5

Lesson
Inadequate assessment of deficiencies in technical and financial capacities to operate, maintain, and manage sanitary landfills could have detrimental impacts. The project completion mission noted deficiencies in the management of the landfill. In the absence of an effective management system, the new landfill currently operates as an uncontrolled dumping site. There is a need for proper handover procedures and transfer of management from the project to the local authorities.

Project Number: 43316-012
Project Name: Pakse Urban Environmental Improvement Project
Report Date:
Lesson
Insufficient project funds and funding for operation and maintenance (O&M) threaten the sustainability of project benefits and outcomes.There are challenges in maintaining and operating the project facilities following project completion because of uncertain annual budget allocations from the government. The revision of project agency roles and responsibilities due to the upgrade of Pakse from a district to a city has led to a shortfall of budget, particularly for landfill operations. The uncompleted riverbank protection work, have made project sustainability less than likely.

Project Number: 43316-012
Project Name: Pakse Urban Environmental Improvement Project
Report Date:
Lesson
The engineering design of infrastructure investments need to be simple and adequately consider post-project financial and human resources capacity for and operation and maintenance. The rationale for this project's overall design was justifiable as it highlighted Pakse as an economic and commercial center of southern Lao PDR. The choice of investments reflected the immediate needs of Pakse. However, in terms of future maintenance, the design of the landfill was considered overly sophisticated for local authorities with limited financial and human resources.

Project Number: 43316-012
Project Name: Pakse Urban Environmental Improvement Project
Report Date:
Lesson
Counterpart funding arrangemnets need to be ascertained if doable in the local context. The project required the government and local communities to contribute 10% to the cost of construction of infrastructure improvements to build community ownership of the project facilities. However, the capacity of the local government and communities to contribute was limited to 4.7% and 1.8%, respectively. Delayed allocation and availability of counterpart funds for resettlement compensation caused delays during implementation.

Project Number: 43316-012
Project Name: Pakse Urban Environmental Improvement Project
Report Date:
Lesson
Sound identification and valuation of costs and benefits in the economic analysis can provide more realistic economic internal rates of return (EIRRs) to indicate a more accurate state of project viability. The economic analysis in the RRP and PCR underestimated the value of the project outputs, particularly the economic benefits of the solid waste management component, which led to a low EIRR. Willingness-to-pay $2 per month for solid waste removal seems too low and unreasonable considering the substantial health and environmental benefits that such removal likely provides.

Project Number: 45507-003
Project Name: Yunnan Chuxiong Urban Environment Improvement Project
Report Date: