Search

Displaying 31 - 45 of 196

Lesson
This validation also offers these lessons: 1. In DMF design, it is most favorable if quantitative indicator targets are described with sufficient context to clearly rationalize the target values. This provides a transparent and logical basis and facilitates the assessment of the validity of the targets. Lack of information on how targets were set and then revised hinders validation.

Project Number: 48218-007
Project Name: Support for Value Chain Development under the Nepal Agriculture Development Strategy
Report Date:
Lesson
No TCR lessons. In finalizing this validation report, NRM added a new lesson: Continued engagement and dialogue with the government on changes in priorities is crucial in determining the most appropriate type of assistance, financing modality and project design. Scope changes in the TA have financial implications, which may require original output targets to be adjusted. In this case, the numbers of corridors and commodities to be mapped were reduced as resources had to be diverted to undertake policy review for the program loan.

Project Number: 48218-007
Project Name: Support for Value Chain Development under the Nepal Agriculture Development Strategy
Report Date:
Lesson
An additional lesson could have been that outcome indicators, which are measurable and relevant to all participating DMCs involved in a regional TA, should be identified.

Project Number: 49342-001
Project Name: Implementing ICT Tools to Improve Data Collection and Management of National Surveys in Support of the Sustainable Development Goals
Report Date:
Lesson
Additional lesson provided by IRM during interdepartmental comments: Cluster TAs such as SIAP have long approval processes due to the need to obtain separate approvals from the Steering Committee as well as ADB management.

Project Number: 46380-001
Project Name: Sustainable Infrastructure Assistance Program
Report Date:
Lesson
The TCR lesson is appropriate but could have been more clearly worded. This lesson, for example, could have been reworded, to wit: “Effective dialogue with implementing agencies during the design stage is critical to efficient planning of activities, budgets, timelines and performance indicators.”

Project Number: 49342-001
Project Name: Implementing ICT Tools to Improve Data Collection and Management of National Surveys in Support of the Sustainable Development Goals
Report Date:
Lesson
Additional lesson provided by IRM during interdepartmental comments: Providing TA support when projects are not in the Blue Book5 and counterparts have not issued commitment letters presents a unique risk that future TA interventions should mitigate.

Project Number: 46380-001
Project Name: Sustainable Infrastructure Assistance Program
Report Date:
Lesson
Additional lesson: Meaningful outcome indicators are consistently, plausibly, and directly linked to desired outcomes.

Project Number: 46380-001
Project Name: Sustainable Infrastructure Assistance Program
Report Date:
Lesson
Reframing this: the TA project could have conducted detailed consultations to identify lessons learned and areas of improvement for poorly performing executing agencies. Needs assessments would have identified a greater degree of targeting of TA interventions and defined the parameters for capacity building.

Project Number: 45376-001
Project Name: Capacity Building for Portfolio Management
Report Date:
Lesson
In capacity building components of a TA project, measuring the quality of training or learning acquired is important (not just the number of participants trained) and this should be reflected in the design of the indicator to better guide assessment of the effectiveness of capacity building activities.

Project Number: 45376-001
Project Name: Capacity Building for Portfolio Management
Report Date:
Lesson
An updated DMF is necessary to capture a TA project’s full extent of impact by aligning indicator years with those of the TA.

Project Number: 45376-001
Project Name: Capacity Building for Portfolio Management
Report Date:
Lesson
This is more of a description of what happened than a lesson. (The first sentence can be read as a lesson, but it is weak (these risks exist in almost any project).

Project Number: 51364-001
Project Name: Establishment of Kazakstan Knowledge Center on Integrated Water Resources Management
Report Date:
Lesson
This lesson seems to suggest that the sequential order of activities could have been replaced by topic_x005F_x0002_based outputs. IED finds that the clear sequential order of activities would have given this TA more strength of TA design and planning.

Project Number: 48377-001
Project Name: Financing Public-Private Partnerships
Report Date:
Lesson
The analysis of results of the TA were constrained by clear evidence concerning the original outcome statement and the revised output indicators. A clear and consistent DMF can help guide the project during implementation, communicate with stakeholders, and facilitate reporting at the end of the project. Validation is facilitated when the approved DMF is clear and reported against in the TCR.

Project Number: 51364-001
Project Name: Establishment of Kazakstan Knowledge Center on Integrated Water Resources Management
Report Date:
Lesson
A carefully developed TOR for consultants during the project planning and design stage ensure that the contract is set up in a most efficient way.

Project Number: 46502-001
Project Name: Trade and Transport Facilitation in the Pacific
Report Date:
Lesson
Flexibility in design and taking account of risks is important; however, the validation notes a lesson that DMF indicators cannot be static when projects are flexible and adjusting to changing contexts. Adjustments to DMF indicators, especially when there are key changes in scope, are necessary.

Project Number: 41613-012
Project Name: Integrated Renewable Energy Development
Report Date: