Search

Displaying 1 - 15 of 91

CSV
Lesson
The implementation of PMC-approved activities led to the production of 78 technical reports and publications. This was executed through the recruitment of 146 consultant contracts including 6 consulting firms, 132 individual consultants and 8 resource persons.

Project Number: 46500-001
Project Name: Establishment of the Pacific Regional Infrastructure Facility Coordination Office
Report Date:
Lesson
A subsequent phase with an approved budget of $9.09 million was approved on 3 October 2019. An increase in TA amount and minor change in scope memo is being processed by the user unit to include a $2 million contribution from the United States. This will be the first contribution from the United States.

Project Number: 46500-001
Project Name: Establishment of the Pacific Regional Infrastructure Facility Coordination Office
Report Date:
Lesson
The TA design and monitoring framework was well devised with sufficient flexibility to respond to the countries’ demands and to the PRIF partners’ demands as the TA progressed—a key feature of the PRIF’s coordination arrangements.

Project Number: 46500-001
Project Name: Establishment of the Pacific Regional Infrastructure Facility Coordination Office
Report Date:
Lesson
Fluctuations in committed and in effective financial contributions from the PRIF partners led to some uncertainties in allocating resources and in budgeting assistance programs. It was not possible to process the European Investment Bank planned cofinancing commitment of $1.1 million equivalent due to legal issues preventing the ability to conclude a cofinancing mechanism and agreement with ADB. During the TA period, ADB built on the constructive working relationship with the Governments of Australia and New Zealand.

Project Number: 46500-001
Project Name: Establishment of the Pacific Regional Infrastructure Facility Coordination Office
Report Date:
Lesson
PRIF partner and stakeholder involvement and participation in PRIF activities, including attendance at SWG coordination meetings or support to the 51 subprojects’ implementation committees. Among the key challenges met was the wide range of assistance expectations from the PRIF partners and the stakeholders and the reconciliation of those expectations with the available PRIF CO resources. This was achieved through the dynamic “management committee/SWG” driven work prioritization mechanism.

Project Number: 46500-001
Project Name: Establishment of the Pacific Regional Infrastructure Facility Coordination Office
Report Date:
Lesson
A total of 24 knowledge products were developed during this TA. Examples of successful and effective hand-over projects include the Pacific utilities benchmarking performance work of PRIF to the Pacific Water and Wastewater Association (PWWA) and to the Pacific Power Association (PPA). The 2016 PWWA benchmarking report was released during the Pacific Water conference and Expo in Tonga, August 2016. The report was based on the indicators developed during 2013 PWWA benchmarking exercise supported by PRIF.

Project Number: 46500-001
Project Name: Establishment of the Pacific Regional Infrastructure Facility Coordination Office
Report Date:
Lesson
Significant changes to the PRIF CO staff (3 to 6 full time staff with 14 different consultants hired under 21 individual contracts) led to challenges in the delivery of services. An operational review conducted in 2018 proposed new operational structures to address “the need for longer-term funding certainty and broader funding base” and “the desire to provide greater stability in PRIF CO management and PRIF CO core team.” Majority of the individual consultants engaged for the TA performed satisfactorily.

Project Number: 46500-001
Project Name: Establishment of the Pacific Regional Infrastructure Facility Coordination Office
Report Date:
Lesson
The TA required close supervision from ADB to ensure smooth cooperation between the executing agency and the consultants. It is also important for ADB to promptly make necessary changes to the consulting team. DIgSILENT GmbH’s team leaders were replaced twice. The first team leader resigned from the company due to his dependent’s illness. The second team leader was replaced by the firm’s Managing Director due to the increasing complexity towards the last phase of the TA.

Project Number: 50318-001
Project Name: Fostering the Development of Renewable Energy
Report Date:
Lesson
Since PowerFactory became the primary system planning platform, KEGOC is planning to procure additional licenses and modules from DIgSILENT in 2020 using its own resources.

Project Number: 50318-001
Project Name: Fostering the Development of Renewable Energy
Report Date:
Lesson
Previously, other development agencies tried to introduce modern power system planning tools in Central Asia, but all of them failed. Such technically complex systems are used by multiple departments of the system operator. From a sustainability perspective, it is important to identify the most suitable system, and allocate sufficient resources for user licenses and training activities.

Project Number: 50318-001
Project Name: Fostering the Development of Renewable Energy
Report Date:
Lesson
The TA provides technical analysis and conclusions that would be interesting for any country that is keen to develop power generation from renewable energy sources.

Project Number: 50318-001
Project Name: Fostering the Development of Renewable Energy
Report Date:
Lesson
The TA was designed adequately. However, future TA projects, with similar technical complexity, should allocate more time and resources for the preparatory phase such as detailing more accurately data collection and translation responsibilities. The planning phase should also consider that state-owned enterprises are often influenced by political decisions going beyond a specific sector and, therefore, additional time is necessary.

Project Number: 50318-001
Project Name: Fostering the Development of Renewable Energy
Report Date:
Lesson
Not applicable. The TA did not involve agencies other than the executing agency, KEGOC, and the consultant and/or contractor. The TA was financed by the Clean Energy Fund under the Clean Energy Financing Partnership Facility.

Project Number: 50318-001
Project Name: Fostering the Development of Renewable Energy
Report Date:
Lesson
The TA was technically complex and relevant only to the energy sector policy maker (Ministry of Energy) and power system operator (KEGOC).

Project Number: 50318-001
Project Name: Fostering the Development of Renewable Energy
Report Date:
Lesson
The recommendations of the final report are particularly important for the former Soviet Union countries that have similarly designed power systems and operational practices. Following the Kazakh experience, in 2019, the “Power the Future” program of the United States Agency for International Development provided two PowerFactory licenses each to Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan.

Project Number: 50318-001
Project Name: Fostering the Development of Renewable Energy
Report Date:
CSV