Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Countries
    • Afghanistan
    • Armenia
    • Azerbaijan
    • Bangladesh
    • Bhutan
    • Brunei Darussalam
    • Cambodia
    • China, People's Republic of
    • Cook Islands
    • Federated States of Micronesia
    • Fiji
    • Georgia
    • Hong Kong, China
    • India
    • Indonesia
    • Kazakhstan
    • Kiribati
    • Kyrgyz Republic
    • Lao People's Democratic Republic
    • Malaysia
    • Maldives
    • Marshall Islands
    • Mongolia
    • Myanmar
    • Nauru
    • Nepal
    • Niue
    • Pakistan
    • Palau
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Philippines
    • Republic of Korea
    • Samoa
    • Singapore
    • Solomon Islands
    • Sri Lanka
    • Taipei,China
    • Tajikistan
    • Thailand
    • Timor-Leste
    • Tonga
    • Turkmenistan
    • Tuvalu
    • Uzbekistan
    • Vanuatu
    • Viet Nam
    • Australia
    • Japan
    • New Zealand
  • Sectors
    • Agriculture, natural resources, and rural development
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Finance
    • Health
    • Industry and trade
    • Information and communication technology
    • Multisector
    • Public sector management
    • Transport
    • Water and other urban infrastructure and services
  • Themes
    • Inclusive Economic Growth
    • Environmentally Sustainable Growth
    • Regional Integration
    • Private Sector Development
    • Governance and Capacity Development
    • Gender Equity and Mainstreaming
    • Knowledge Solutions
    • Partnerships
  • About

Search

Displaying 1 - 2 of 2

Lesson
When designing results frameworks, the use of policy actions as results indicators should be minimized. If the indicator measures the reform success by the completion of the policy actions, it provides little information on the success of that policy action and undermines the relevance of the policy action for no result is achieved other than itself.

Project Number: 53248-001
Project Name: Second Public Efficiency and Financial Markets Program
Report Date: 25 Oct 2023

Lesson
The DMF missed some essential data that were important in measuring project effectiveness. As this was a follow-up project, both executing agency and ADB should have had up-to-date data and information. To avoid such issues, ADB needs to make a rigorous assessment of the institutional arrangements, and database benchmarks in the case of long-term commitments and preparation of additional follow-on projects.

Project Number: 42275-013
Project Name: Second Upper Secondary Education
Development Project
Report Date: 02 Jun 2022

Content type

  • Lesson (2)

Countries

  • Armenia (1)
  • Viet Nam (1)

Sectors

  • Education (1)
  • Finance (1)
  • Public sector management (1)

Themes

  • Inclusive Economic Growth (1)
  • Governance and Capacity Development (1)
  • Gender Equity and Mainstreaming (1)

Report Year

  • 2023 (1)
  • 2022 (1)

Report Source

  • Validation of self-evaluation (2)

Report Rating

  • Successful (2)

Applicability

  • (-) Results framework and methodology level (2)
  • Country-level (9)
  • Program-level (37)
  • Project-level (28)
  • Sector-level (30)

Topics

  • Availability of baseline data (1)
  • Beneficiary targeting (1)
  • Budgeting (1)
  • Capacity development (1)
  • Commitment and leadership (1)
  • Completion (1)
  • Country context (1)
  • Data availability and baselines (15)
  • Data availability and baseslines (2)
  • DMF (3)
  • DMF, Energy efficiency projects (1)
  • DMF, Indicators (3)
  • DMF, indicators, targets (1)
  • DMF, Monitoring and evaluation (1)
  • DMF, Project targets, Indicators (1)
  • DMF, targets (1)
  • DMF. Indicators (1)
  • Economic (3)
  • Environmental (1)
  • Epidemics (2)
  • Finance and financial aspects (1)
  • Financial (3)
  • Gender (7)
  • Implementation (1)
  • Indicators (49)
  • Indicators, Targets (1)
  • Institutional (1)
  • Methodologies / approaches (1)
  • Monitoring and evaluation (78)
  • Others (3)
  • Overambitious objectives (2)
  • Overambitious targets (3)
  • Project design (18)
  • Project management (1)
  • Project targets (1)
  • Social (1)
  • Stakeholder engagement (1)
  • Targets (1)
  • Technical (6)
  • Time allocation or task sequencing (1)
  • (-) Policy and reform (1)
  • (-) Roles and responsibilities (1)

Subscribe to our mailing list

6 ADB Avenue,
Mandaluyong City
1550, Metro Manila,
Philippines

 

Phone: +632 632 4444
Fax: +632 636 2444

Other ADB Websites

ADB Compliance Review Panel
Asia Pathways (ADBI Blog)
Asia Regional Integration Center
Asian Bonds Online
Asian Development Blog
Open Access Repository
Statistical Database System

IED Social Media

LinkedIn

X

YouTube

©2026 Independent Evaluation - Asian Development Bank

Footer

  • About
  • Home
  • Countries
  • Sectors
  • Themes
  • About