Search

Displaying 1 - 10 of 10

Lesson
The project has highlighted the need to provide ongoing operation and maintenance (O&M) capacity building support and to monitor actual O&M implementation after loan closure. Future projects should incorporate provision for executing agencies to establish O&M technical support teams conducting biannual infrastructure O&M inspections and providing ongoing training to LGUs on O&M practices after project completion.

Project Number: 30552-013
Project Name: Infrastructure for Rural Productivity Enhancement Sector Project
Report Date:
Lesson
Slow funds liquidation results in inadequate funds availability, slowing implementation. Future projects should ensure that seamless, efficient, and simple funds disbursement processes are established that satisfy appropriate procurement and financial audit requirements. Future projects should consider (i) direct payment of contractors by ADB; (ii) making imprest account levels appropriate to the funds flows anticipated; and (iii) simplified disbursement procedures and documentation requirements, preferably through the executing agency.

Project Number: 30552-013
Project Name: Infrastructure for Rural Productivity Enhancement Sector Project
Report Date:
Lesson
Placing support teams, including consultants, in the regions and zonal project offices is critical to providing LGUs guidance and technical assistance when and where needed. Careful consideration is required regarding the relative mix between executing agency personnel and consultants to ensure the executing agencies are adequately resourced with the appropriate technical skills so as to retain project experience within the agency after a project is completed.

Project Number: 30552-013
Project Name: Infrastructure for Rural Productivity Enhancement Sector Project
Report Date:
Lesson
The project demonstrated that successful local government unit (LGU)-led, demand-driven, decentralized implementation is a viable delivery mechanism for the planning, development, and management of rural infrastructure. Examination of the reasons for the delayed start yield valuable lessons for future projects.

Project Number: 30552-013
Project Name: Infrastructure for Rural Productivity Enhancement Sector Project
Report Date:
Lesson
The project's design: (i) did not anticipate the scale and nature of change in implementation arrangements that would arise from choosing the Ministry of Interior as the executing agency; (ii) underestimated coordination difficulties between government agencies - notably between the executing agency and Council for Agricultural and Rural Development (in its role as chair of the project steering committee) and between the Tonle Sap Biosphere Reserve Secretariat, Fisheries Administration, and Ministry of Environment for output 2; and (iii) overestimated the appetite for change in fisheri

Project Number: 39603-012
Project Name: Tonle Sap Sustainable Livelihoods
Report Date:
Lesson
Although the project appears relatively efficient against its own delivery expectations, the extent to which such institutional complexity potentially adds to overall investment delivery costs remains unknown in the absence of reliable quantified benefits data from the project itself that would allow a comparison of different approaches. In institutionally complex projects such as this, implementation and eventual output delivery are especially likely to be affected (both positively and negatively) by circumstances not always foreseeable at design.

Project Number: 39603-012
Project Name: Tonle Sap Sustainable Livelihoods
Report Date:
Lesson
Project experience demonstrates that it is possible to improve natural resource-based livelihoods in a decentralization context, but that doing so is institutionally complex.

Project Number: 39603-012
Project Name: Tonle Sap Sustainable Livelihoods
Report Date:
Lesson
Timely project completion report (PCR) is important for maintaining policy dialogue and assessing the need for follow-up actions and future assistance. Project Administration Instruction No. 6.07A recommends that the PCR be prepared between 1-2 years after project completion. In the case of Rural Financial Sector Development Program (RFSDP) program loan, the second (and final) tranche was released in February 2006. The bulk of activities under Project 1 and Project 2 were completed in 2008.

Project Number: 34320-013
Project Name: Rural Finance Sector Development Program
Report Date:
Lesson
The program loan tranches were front-loaded, with $35 million of the total program amount of $50 million programmed for the first two tranches. The first two tranches were largely preparatory measures and intermediate steps. Had the program been back-loaded with relatively larger amounts allocated to the third and fourth tranches, it is possible that the authorities would have been more inclined to implement some of the more difficult reform measures.

Project Number: 34320-013
Project Name: Rural Finance Sector Development Program
Report Date:
Lesson
Overly ambitious and complex projects are less likely to be successful. The Program objectives had a strong rationale and the design was technically sound. However, in view of the weak implementation capacity of the executing agency and the implementing agencies, the Program would likely have yielded better results with a more focused and prioritized set of policy actions and project activities. Moreover, the Rural Financial Sector Development Program was approved only three months prior to the April 2004 parliamentary election.

Project Number: 34320-013
Project Name: Rural Finance Sector Development Program
Report Date: