Search

Displaying 1 - 15 of 56

CSV
Lesson
The restricted stance on public external borrowing led to deferral of MFF’s tranches 2 and 3 that was not present at the time of appraisal. If possible, the locations and routes of the project components for these tranches should be identified upfront and thoroughly analyzed for potential construction and safeguard impacts.

Project Number: 42401-015
Project Name: Power Distribution Enhancement Investment Program - Tranche 1
Report Date:
Lesson
In MFFs, subsequent tranches should be processed and implemented to overlap with tranche 1 to maintain implementation momentum and achieve maximum benefits. The program’s tranches 2 and 3 were supposed to be approved in November 2017 and March 2018, respectively.

Project Number: 42401-015
Project Name: Power Distribution Enhancement Investment Program - Tranche 1
Report Date:
Lesson
The project management units for subsequent tranches should be more proactive in using the project management and supervision consultant for the capacity development of the operational staff on new technology and standards.

Project Number: 42401-015
Project Name: Power Distribution Enhancement Investment Program - Tranche 1
Report Date:
Lesson
In addition, contractors are encouraged to improvise where possible and introduce new technology standards. Subsequent tranches should also build upon lessons learnt and issues identified in the technical specifications for the initial tranche.

Project Number: 42401-015
Project Name: Power Distribution Enhancement Investment Program - Tranche 1
Report Date:
Lesson
To achieve higher quality and improved technology, it is crucial that the design, technical specifications, and construction standards are based on national and international best practice.

Project Number: 42401-015
Project Name: Power Distribution Enhancement Investment Program - Tranche 1
Report Date:
Lesson
Exercising greater care in estimating traffic demand projections is of utmost importance. Overly optimistic forecasts of traffic volumes can stem from using outdated or arbitrary parameters and unrealistic assumptions. For instance, elasticity values of road transport demand may have changed over time. Also, the use of national GDP as a proxy for economic activities at the regional or local level could result in unrealistic traffic forecasts. Both of these could lead to an overly designed project.

Project Number: 39176-013
Project Name: Road Network Development Program (Multitranche Financing Facility and Tranche 4)
Report Date:
Lesson
Program preparation stage benefits from upfront capacity development. Specifically, institutional capacity assessment of executing and implementing agencies at the onset is vital in planning for appropriate measures to support the agencies during the program. Technical assistance for capacity building helps complement such assessments by filling in gaps in capacity to enhance their financial, procurement, and technical capacity skills.

Project Number: 39176-013
Project Name: Road Network Development Program (Multitranche Financing Facility and Tranche 4)
Report Date:
Lesson
Programs that involve public sector management and finance reforms need to consider information from the country’s Supreme Audit Institution, not only to inform their views on the transparency and accountability of government administration before the program commences, but also in the evaluation of the program once it is complete.

Project Number: 50145-001
Project Name: Countercyclical Support Facility Program
Report Date:
Lesson
The assessment of a program’s development effectiveness is difficult in the absence of a structured and aligned outcome indicators.

Project Number: 50145-001
Project Name: Countercyclical Support Facility Program
Report Date:
Lesson
Appropriate targeting method and the quality of the fiscal stimulus are crucial in supporting CSF programs.

Project Number: 50145-001
Project Name: Countercyclical Support Facility Program
Report Date:
Lesson
Inadequate coordination of construction and asset management functions could put at risk the sustainability of road sector assets.

Project Number: 39176-043
Project Name: Road Network Development Program – Tranche 3
Report Date:
Lesson
A 50:50 quality- and cost-based selection method favors the engagement of the most qualified auditors for ADB-financed projects in Azerbaijan.

Project Number: 39176-043
Project Name: Road Network Development Program – Tranche 3
Report Date:
Lesson
A comprehensive road maintenance program, with adequate and transparent funding, is vital to extending a road network’s productive life.

Project Number: 39176-043
Project Name: Road Network Development Program – Tranche 3
Report Date:
Lesson
Poor engineering designs can lead to additional costs and implementation delays.

Project Number: 39176-043
Project Name: Road Network Development Program – Tranche 3
Report Date:
Lesson
Lack of interagency coordination and project oversight platform weakens problem-solving and the implementation of integrated, cross-sector solutions.

Project Number: 39176-043
Project Name: Road Network Development Program – Tranche 3
Report Date:
CSV