The TA would have benefited from having an officially designated implementing agency instead of having assigned the dual, de facto role to the executing agency—particularly one that is situated at the ministerial (State Council) level of government. The DRC, by virtue of its stature and function, would not have the capacity nor expected responsibility to supervise and monitor day-to-day TA activities at the project level. Simply assigning staff from its two departments to work with the TA team may not be the best recourse. Project records indicate there was lack of ownership given the very low attendance and participation to important project meetings.
Improving Energy Efficiency, Emission Control, and Compliance Management of the Manufacturing Industr