Skip to main content
Evaluation Lessons
Toggle navigation
Home
Countries
Afghanistan
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Bangladesh
Bhutan
Brunei Darussalam
Cambodia
China, People's Republic of
Cook Islands
Federated States of Micronesia
Fiji
Georgia
Hong Kong, China
India
Indonesia
Kazakhstan
Kiribati
Kyrgyz Republic
Lao People’s Democratic Republic
Malaysia
Maldives
Marshall Islands
Mongolia
Myanmar
Nauru
Nepal
Niue
Pakistan
Palau
Papua New Guinea
Philippines
Republic of Korea
Samoa
Singapore
Solomon Islands
Sri Lanka
Taipei,China
Tajikistan
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Tonga
Turkmenistan
Tuvalu
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Viet Nam
Australia
Japan
New Zealand
Sectors
Agriculture, natural resources, and rural development
Education
Energy
Finance
Health
Industry and trade
Information and communication technology
Multisector
Public sector management
Transport
Water and other urban infrastructure and services
Themes
Inclusive Economic Growth
Environmentally Sustainable Growth
Regional Integration
Private Sector Development
Governance and Capacity Development
Gender Equity and Mainstreaming
Knowledge Solutions
Partnerships
About
Home
Countries
Sectors
Themes
About
Search
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
Lesson
The lessons drawn by the PCR are valuable to ADB. ADB needs to seriously consider the socioeconomic and political environments in designing projects. Implementing a project in an unstable environment is not likely to yield positive outcomes. Proper timing is important in introducing a project especially when it entails a paradigm shift (i.e., from supply-led to demand driven). The experience with this project highlighted the need for greater coordination with other donors in addressing the country’s strategic development needs.
Project Number:
32541-013
Project Name:
Fiji: Alternative Livelihoods Development Project
Report Date:
27 Dec 2012
Lesson
Poor countries are rightly skeptical of borrowing only for consulting services because in the absence of the requisite infrastructure they fail to internalize outputs and derive gains from the institutional reforms in full. This affects the extent to which government ownership materializes through the course of implementation. The RRP summarized the lessons identified from prior financial sector reform projects (RRP, page 11, para. 35) on government ownership in terms of the reform agenda.
Project Number:
28332-013
Project Name:
Corporate and Financial Governance Project
Report Date:
10 Dec 2012