Search

Displaying 46 - 56 of 56

Lesson
More attention should be devoted during the project preparation stage to setting up appropriate DMF performance targets.

Project Number: 38301-013
Project Name: Dryland Sustainable Agriculture Project
Report Date:
Lesson
For consistency in economic analyses, a common methodology must be used by all—the ADB staff, consultants, and the government.

Project Number: 41462-013
Project Name: Comprehensive Socioeconomic Urban Development Project in Viet Tri, Hung Yen, and Dong Dang
Report Date:
Lesson
There is a need for ADB projects to further strengthen the quality of economic analysis.

Project Number: 41462-013
Project Name: Comprehensive Socioeconomic Urban Development Project in Viet Tri, Hung Yen, and Dong Dang
Report Date:
Lesson
It is crucial to formulate performance indicators that demonstrate linkages within the results chain; this will ensure a better assessment and accounting of project achievements.

Project Number: 42334-013
Project Name: Rural Roads Improvement Project
Report Date:
Lesson
It is essential to prepare meaningful monitoring frameworks measured by relevant indicators to assess project results objectively.

Project Number: 42039-035
Project Name: Power Transmission Investment Program – Tranche 2
Report Date:
Lesson
As a development bank, identifying value addition to road infrastructure investments in the DMF will give more relevance to ADB interventions.

Project Number: 46145-001
Project Name: CAREC Corridor 3 (Shymkent–Tashkent Section) Road Improvement Project
Report Date:
Lesson
In designing the desired outputs that are linked to higher-level results, it is important to be consistent within particular operations and across operations that form the program.

Project Number: 36172-063
Project Name: Strengthening Public Management Program
Report Date:
Lesson
The DMF targets need to be project related. It used a target for impact indicator that linked project output to government revenue. While it is possible to reasonably forecast results, the government revenue may change for reasons unrelated to the project or the sector, as seen in this case.

Project Number: 37399-013
Project Name: Green Power Development Project
Report Date:
Lesson
The DMF was reasonably well-designed and the performance indicators—with the exception of the initial program impact indicators—targets, and baseline data were precise and generally easily measurable. However, the PCR assessed the program against the DMF prepared for subprogram 3, which, like subprogram 2 had no indicators to measure impact, although these were included for subprogram 1.

Project Number: 48044-001, 48044-004, 48044-005
Project Name: Improving Domestic Resource Mobilization for Inclusive Growth Program
Report Date:
Lesson
It was inappropriate to change the original DMF targets because the progress was inadequate (para. 20). Instead, the reasons for the slow progress could have been mentioned and draw lessons from them.

Project Number: 41171-022
Project Name: Transport Sector Development Project
Report Date:
Lesson
ADB’s policy on risk assessment and risk management should be reviewed to allow for a consistent approach within projects, programs, or even across subprograms. Risk assessment is often carried out by considering a matrix of likelihood and consequential severity to define the level of risk (individually and overall) before and after the controls or mitigation strategies are in place. The PCR template should also allow for discussion on risk to explicitly consider whether the risk mitigation strategies had been successful.

Project Number: 47318-001
Project Name: Strengthened Fiscal Sustainability Program
Report Date: