Skip to main content
Evaluation Lessons
  • Home
  • Countries
    • Afghanistan
    • Armenia
    • Azerbaijan
    • Bangladesh
    • Bhutan
    • Brunei Darussalam
    • Cambodia
    • China, People's Republic of
    • Cook Islands
    • Federated States of Micronesia
    • Fiji
    • Georgia
    • Hong Kong, China
    • India
    • Indonesia
    • Kazakhstan
    • Kiribati
    • Kyrgyz Republic
    • Lao People’s Democratic Republic
    • Malaysia
    • Maldives
    • Marshall Islands
    • Mongolia
    • Myanmar
    • Nauru
    • Nepal
    • Niue
    • Pakistan
    • Palau
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Philippines
    • Republic of Korea
    • Samoa
    • Singapore
    • Solomon Islands
    • Sri Lanka
    • Taipei,China
    • Tajikistan
    • Thailand
    • Timor-Leste
    • Tonga
    • Turkmenistan
    • Tuvalu
    • Uzbekistan
    • Vanuatu
    • Viet Nam
    • Australia
    • Japan
    • New Zealand
  • Sectors
    • Agriculture, natural resources, and rural development
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Finance
    • Health
    • Industry and trade
    • Information and communication technology
    • Multisector
    • Public sector management
    • Transport
    • Water and other urban infrastructure and services
  • Themes
    • Inclusive Economic Growth
    • Environmentally Sustainable Growth
    • Regional Integration
    • Private Sector Development
    • Governance and Capacity Development
    • Gender Equity and Mainstreaming
    • Knowledge Solutions
    • Partnerships
  • About
  • Home
  • Countries
  • Sectors
  • Themes
  • About

Search

Displaying 1 - 2 of 2

Lesson
The collection of sex-disaggregated data remains to be a challenge in Georgia and this needs greater attention in ensuing programs in the country. The collection of sex-disaggregated data to support CPRO design and implementation was challenging, hindered in some cases by the emergency situation, and in other instances, by the limitations in government databases. This highlights the need for ensuing programs to carefully evaluate and identify the appropriate gender indicators in ensuing programs.

Project Number: 54191-001
Project Name: COVID-19 Active Response and Expenditure Support Program
Report Date: 21 Sep 2022

Lesson
Lack of strategic information can affect the quality of gender targets set at approval, making them difficult to achieve during implementation. Disaggregated information by gender was not available during project preparation. This affected the quality of the gender targets included in the design and monitoring framework (DMF) and the gender action plan (GAP). Challenges in achieving the targets during implementation should have prompted a deeper review of these targets with adjustments made as necessary.

Project Number: 42414-023
Project Name: Sustainable Urban Transport Investment Program - Tranche 1
Report Date: 29 Jul 2022

Content type

  • (-) Lesson (2)

Countries

  • (-) Georgia (2)
  • Azerbaijan (1)
  • Bangladesh (1)
  • Cambodia (2)
  • China, People's Republic of (4)
  • Federated States of Micronesia (1)
  • India (17)
  • Indonesia (3)
  • Kazakhstan (1)
  • Kiribati (1)
  • Kyrgyz Republic (2)
  • Lao People’s Democratic Republic (2)
  • Maldives (1)
  • Marshall Islands (1)
  • Mongolia (3)
  • Nepal (1)
  • Pakistan (2)
  • Philippines (1)
  • Samoa (1)
  • Solomon Islands (1)
  • Tajikistan (3)
  • Thailand (1)
  • Timor-Leste (3)
  • Tonga (1)
  • Uzbekistan (6)
  • Vanuatu (1)
  • Viet Nam (5)

Sectors

  • Health (1)
  • Public sector management (1)
  • Transport (1)

Themes

  • Inclusive Economic Growth (2)
  • Environmentally Sustainable Growth (1)
  • Regional Integration (1)
  • Governance and Capacity Development (1)
  • Gender Equity and Mainstreaming (2)

Report Year

  • 2022 (2)

Report Source

  • Self-evaluation (2)

Report Rating

  • Successful (2)

Applicability

  • Country-level (1)
  • Project-level (1)

Topics

  • Awareness and communication strategies (1)
  • Budgeting (5)
  • Capacity development (4)
  • Change in leadership (1)
  • Change in priorities (1)
  • Commitment and leadership (2)
  • Country context (2)
  • Data availability and baselines (2)
  • Design and/or planning (23)
  • Electoral changes (2)
  • Electoral cycles (2)
  • Environmental (3)
  • Epidemics (1)
  • Finance and financial aspects (9)
  • Financial (3)
  • Financing mechanism (3)
  • Implementation and/or Delivery (20)
  • Indicators (8)
  • Institutional (8)
  • Knowledge building (15)
  • Management (staffing, including consultants) (11)
  • Methodologies / approaches (7)
  • Modality (3)
  • Monitoring and evaluation (12)
  • Monitoring and evalution (1)
  • Natural disasters (2)
  • Organizational capacity (2)
  • Other (5)
  • Others (6)
  • Overambitious objectives (1)
  • Partnership (and cofinancing) (12)
  • Policy and reform (6)
  • Political (2)
  • Political interference (1)
  • Post-TA financial resources (8)
  • Procurement (5)
  • Project design (29)
  • Project management (1)
  • Project readiness (1)
  • Project readiness; MFF (1)
  • Project reporting (1)
  • Replication and scaling Up (13)
  • Reporting and supervision (3)
  • Safeguards - Georgia; LAR - Georgia (2)
  • Sector issues (4)
  • Skilled human resources (1)
  • Social (3)
  • Staff turnover (1)
  • Stakeholder engagement (13)
  • Stakeholder participation (14)
  • Stakeholder selection (2)
  • Technical (7)
  • Time allocation or task sequencing (6)
  • Voice and accountability (1)
  • (-) Gender (2)

Subscribe to our mailing list

6 ADB Avenue,
Mandaluyong City
1550, Metro Manila,
Philippines

 

Phone: +632 632 4444
Fax: +632 636 2444

Other ADB Websites

ADB Compliance Review Panel
Asia Pathways (ADBI Blog)
Asia Regional Integration Center
Asian Bonds Online
Asian Development Blog
Open Access Repository
Statistical Database System

IED Social Media

LinkedIn

Twitter

YouTube

©2024 Independent Evaluation - Asian Development Bank

Footer

  • About