Search

Displaying 106 - 120 of 141

Lesson
A more proper design of the TA component and a firm-based consultancy recommended at appraisal along with a more realistic budget. DOF and SGD should have strengthened their procurement capacity prior to the TA loan and this could have been a condition for the release of the tranche 1 funds given that it was their first large ADB-fund project. Although this was recognized, it was thought that such a risk could have been mitigated through the capacity building provided under the TA loan.

Project Number: 41607-013
Project Name: Mizoram Public Resource Management Program
Report Date:
Lesson
Additional consideration should have been given to the provision of the following, which addresses particular problems encountered: The lack of consultant staff willing to work in Jammu and Kashmir should have been anticipated.

Project Number: 38136-013
Project Name: Multisector Project for Infrastructure Rehabilitation in Jammu and Kashmir
Report Date:
Lesson
Consultant’s bid documents and the terms of references should have been strengthened before these were issued.

Project Number: 38136-013
Project Name: Multisector Project for Infrastructure Rehabilitation in Jammu and Kashmir
Report Date:
Lesson
Additional assistance provided to the ERA by appointing PSU staff consultants to assist in project implementation.

Project Number: 38136-013
Project Name: Multisector Project for Infrastructure Rehabilitation in Jammu and Kashmir
Report Date:
Lesson
Adequate institutional capacity in the EA and IA is crucial to the competion of the MFF within the approved period.

Project Number: 37139-043
Project Name: Uttarakhand Power Sector Investment Program - Tranche 3
Report Date:
Lesson
A more robust social and environmental due diligence for HPP projects promotes a stronger buy-in from local communities.

Project Number: 37139-033
Project Name: Uttarakhand Power Sector Investment Program - Tranche 2
Report Date:
Lesson
Grant funding, while beneficial for end-users, may not be appropriate for revenue-earning state-owned utilities.

Project Number: 37139-043
Project Name: Uttarakhand Power Sector Investment Program - Tranche 3
Report Date:
Lesson
Having a suitable EA is critical to project success.

Project Number: 37139-033
Project Name: Uttarakhand Power Sector Investment Program - Tranche 2
Report Date:
Lesson
Effective risk mitigation requires adequate planning and prompt action.

Project Number: 37139-043
Project Name: Uttarakhand Power Sector Investment Program - Tranche 3
Report Date:
Lesson
Stringent due diligences at appraisal against the risks in projects developed by other agencies strengthen the likelihood of success.

Project Number: 37139-033
Project Name: Uttarakhand Power Sector Investment Program - Tranche 2
Report Date:
Lesson
MFF utilization within the approved period requires adequate institutional capacity in the EA and IA.

Project Number: 37139-033
Project Name: Uttarakhand Power Sector Investment Program - Tranche 2
Report Date:
Lesson
Having a suitable EA is critical to project success.

Project Number: 37139-043
Project Name: Uttarakhand Power Sector Investment Program - Tranche 3
Report Date:
Lesson
Grant funding, while beneficial for end-users, may not be appropriate for revenue-earning utility agencies.

Project Number: 37139-033
Project Name: Uttarakhand Power Sector Investment Program - Tranche 2
Report Date:
Lesson
A rigorous technical and financial due diligence for mitigating risks boosts the likelihood of project success.

Project Number: 37139-033
Project Name: Uttarakhand Power Sector Investment Program - Tranche 2
Report Date:
Lesson
A need-based approach to capacity development optimizes project learning opportunities.

Project Number: 37139-043
Project Name: Uttarakhand Power Sector Investment Program - Tranche 3
Report Date: