Skip to main content
Evaluation Lessons
  • Home
  • Countries
    • Afghanistan
    • Armenia
    • Azerbaijan
    • Bangladesh
    • Bhutan
    • Brunei Darussalam
    • Cambodia
    • China, People's Republic of
    • Cook Islands
    • Federated States of Micronesia
    • Fiji
    • Georgia
    • Hong Kong, China
    • India
    • Indonesia
    • Kazakhstan
    • Kiribati
    • Kyrgyz Republic
    • Lao People’s Democratic Republic
    • Malaysia
    • Maldives
    • Marshall Islands
    • Mongolia
    • Myanmar
    • Nauru
    • Nepal
    • Niue
    • Pakistan
    • Palau
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Philippines
    • Republic of Korea
    • Samoa
    • Singapore
    • Solomon Islands
    • Sri Lanka
    • Taipei,China
    • Tajikistan
    • Thailand
    • Timor-Leste
    • Tonga
    • Turkmenistan
    • Tuvalu
    • Uzbekistan
    • Vanuatu
    • Viet Nam
    • Australia
    • Japan
    • New Zealand
  • Sectors
    • Agriculture, natural resources, and rural development
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Finance
    • Health
    • Industry and trade
    • Information and communication technology
    • Multisector
    • Public sector management
    • Transport
    • Water and other urban infrastructure and services
  • Themes
    • Inclusive Economic Growth
    • Environmentally Sustainable Growth
    • Regional Integration
    • Private Sector Development
    • Governance and Capacity Development
    • Gender Equity and Mainstreaming
    • Knowledge Solutions
    • Partnerships
  • About
  • Home
  • Countries
  • Sectors
  • Themes
  • About

Search

Displaying 1 - 2 of 2

Lesson
Program design and implementation in least developed (and fragile) countries need to take account of the limited administrative capacity of the government. While ADB designed a program which supported the government in undertaking reforms and sufficient consulting services resources to help bridge capacity gaps, the timeframe for the program was too ambitious and ADB did not provide adequate continuity in the staff providing project supervision. These deficiencies contributed to the underperformance in program outcomes.

Project Number: 46059-001, 46059-002
Project Name: Governance and Capacity Development in Public Sector Management Program - Subprogram 2
Report Date: 04 Apr 2022

Lesson
Impact indicators in the results framework need to have casual connection to the program’s outputs and outcomes. The civil service and budgetary reforms supported by the program will contribute to more efficient public administration and budget expenditures over time. However, they can only contribute at the margin to poverty and maternal mortality reduction, which were the impact indicators for the program. These indicators were not aligned with the impact statement, which aimed for improved service delivery.

Project Number: 46059-001, 46059-002
Project Name: Governance and Capacity Development in Public Sector Management Program - Subprogram 2
Report Date: 04 Apr 2022

Content type

  • Lesson (2)

Countries

  • (-) Lao People’s Democratic Republic (2)
  • Afghanistan (6)
  • Armenia (23)
  • Bangladesh (10)
  • Bhutan (20)
  • Cambodia (21)
  • Cook Islands (6)
  • Federated States of Micronesia (2)
  • Georgia (23)
  • India (35)
  • Indonesia (35)
  • Kazakhstan (9)
  • Kiribati (8)
  • Kyrgyz Republic (26)
  • Maldives (13)
  • Marshall Islands (9)
  • Mongolia (10)
  • Nauru (5)
  • Nepal (16)
  • Pakistan (10)
  • Palau (8)
  • Papua New Guinea (4)
  • Philippines (14)
  • Samoa (9)
  • Solomon Islands (17)
  • Sri Lanka (9)
  • Tajikistan (13)
  • Thailand (7)
  • Tonga (15)
  • Tuvalu (11)
  • Uzbekistan (17)
  • Viet Nam (4)

Sectors

  • Public sector management (2)
    • (-) Public expenditure and fiscal management (2)

Themes

  • (-) Inclusive Economic Growth (2)
  • Governance and Capacity Development (2)
  • Gender Equity and Mainstreaming (2)

Report Year

  • 2022 (2)

Report Source

  • Validation of self-evaluation (2)

Report Rating

  • Less than successful (2)

Applicability

  • Program-level (1)
  • Results framework and methodology level (1)

Topics

  • Monitoring and evaluation (1)
  • Overambitious objectives (1)
  • Project design (1)
  • Staff turnover (1)

Subscribe to our mailing list

6 ADB Avenue,
Mandaluyong City
1550, Metro Manila,
Philippines

 

Phone: +632 632 4444
Fax: +632 636 2444

Other ADB Websites

ADB Compliance Review Panel
Asia Pathways (ADBI Blog)
Asia Regional Integration Center
Asian Bonds Online
Asian Development Blog
Open Access Repository
Statistical Database System

IED Social Media

LinkedIn

Twitter

YouTube

©2024 Independent Evaluation - Asian Development Bank

Footer

  • About