Skip to main content
Evaluation Lessons
  • Home
  • Countries
    • Afghanistan
    • Armenia
    • Azerbaijan
    • Bangladesh
    • Bhutan
    • Brunei Darussalam
    • Cambodia
    • China, People's Republic of
    • Cook Islands
    • Federated States of Micronesia
    • Fiji
    • Georgia
    • Hong Kong, China
    • India
    • Indonesia
    • Kazakhstan
    • Kiribati
    • Kyrgyz Republic
    • Lao People’s Democratic Republic
    • Malaysia
    • Maldives
    • Marshall Islands
    • Mongolia
    • Myanmar
    • Nauru
    • Nepal
    • Niue
    • Pakistan
    • Palau
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Philippines
    • Republic of Korea
    • Samoa
    • Singapore
    • Solomon Islands
    • Sri Lanka
    • Taipei,China
    • Tajikistan
    • Thailand
    • Timor-Leste
    • Tonga
    • Turkmenistan
    • Tuvalu
    • Uzbekistan
    • Vanuatu
    • Viet Nam
    • Australia
    • Japan
    • New Zealand
  • Sectors
    • Agriculture, natural resources, and rural development
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Finance
    • Health
    • Industry and trade
    • Information and communication technology
    • Multisector
    • Public sector management
    • Transport
    • Water and other urban infrastructure and services
  • Themes
    • Inclusive Economic Growth
    • Environmentally Sustainable Growth
    • Regional Integration
    • Private Sector Development
    • Governance and Capacity Development
    • Gender Equity and Mainstreaming
    • Knowledge Solutions
    • Partnerships
  • About
  • Home
  • Countries
  • Sectors
  • Themes
  • About

Search

Displaying 1 - 2 of 2

Lesson
When programs embody reforms that are directed at strengthening the institutional framework for the operation of key markets, such as those underlying financial markets, clearly articulating them in the program documents clarifies objectives. By not doing so, it risks the results of the program not being fully apparent due to the lengthy period for the reforms to come to fruition. By setting as outcome objectives, what the improved framework will lead to places the outcome outside the time frame of the program

Project Number: 51060-002, 51060-003
Project Name: Public Efficiency and Financial Markets Program (Subprograms 1 and 2)
Report Date: 17 Nov 2022

Lesson
Strong alignment with government strategies and priorities leads to strong government ownership and participation in program implementation. The reforms adopted under this program were essential to improve fiscal credibility and strengthen the capital market in Armenia. They were fully aligned with the strategies of the government and ADB. Because of this strong strategic alignment, government ownership of the program remained strong and all implementing agencies actively coordinated with ADB to achieve the reform agenda.

Project Number: 53248-001
Project Name: Second Public Efficiency and Financial Markets Program
Report Date: 29 Sep 2022

Content type

  • Lesson (2)

Countries

  • (-) Armenia (2)
  • Afghanistan (5)
  • Azerbaijan (6)
  • Bangladesh (1)
  • Cambodia (6)
  • China, People's Republic of (5)
  • Federated States of Micronesia (7)
  • Georgia (10)
  • Indonesia (7)
  • Kazakhstan (5)
  • Kyrgyz Republic (13)
  • Lao People’s Democratic Republic (1)
  • Maldives (1)
  • Marshall Islands (7)
  • Mongolia (6)
  • Nepal (5)
  • Pakistan (5)
  • Palau (1)
  • Philippines (1)
  • Samoa (2)
  • Solomon Islands (8)
  • Tajikistan (11)
  • Thailand (1)
  • Tonga (13)
  • Turkmenistan (5)
  • Tuvalu (1)
  • Uzbekistan (5)
  • Vanuatu (2)

Sectors

  • Finance (2)
  • Public sector management (2)
    • (-) Public expenditure and fiscal management (2)
    • Economic affairs management (1)

Themes

  • Inclusive Economic Growth (1)
  • Private Sector Development (1)
  • Governance and Capacity Development (1)
  • Knowledge Solutions (1)
  • Partnerships (1)

Report Year

  • 2022 (2)

Report Source

  • Self-evaluation (1)
  • Validation of self-evaluation (1)

Report Rating

  • Successful (2)

Applicability

  • Program-level (1)

Topics

  • Awareness and communication strategies (1)
  • Design and/or planning (6)
  • Implementation and/or Delivery (5)
  • Indicators (1)
  • Knowledge building (3)
  • Lack of commitment (1)
  • Management (staffing, including consultants) (3)
  • Modality (2)
  • Monitoring and evaluation (1)
  • Organizational capacity (1)
  • Partnership (and cofinancing) (2)
  • Policy and reform (1)
  • Post-TA financial resources (1)
  • Programmatic approach to reforms (2)
  • Replication and scaling Up (2)
  • Skilled human resources (1)
  • Stakeholder participation (2)
  • (-) Project design (2)

Subscribe to our mailing list

6 ADB Avenue,
Mandaluyong City
1550, Metro Manila,
Philippines

 

Phone: +632 632 4444
Fax: +632 636 2444

Other ADB Websites

ADB Compliance Review Panel
Asia Pathways (ADBI Blog)
Asia Regional Integration Center
Asian Bonds Online
Asian Development Blog
Open Access Repository
Statistical Database System

IED Social Media

LinkedIn

Twitter

YouTube

©2024 Independent Evaluation - Asian Development Bank

Footer

  • About