Skip to main content
Evaluation Lessons
  • Home
  • Countries
    • Afghanistan
    • Armenia
    • Azerbaijan
    • Bangladesh
    • Bhutan
    • Brunei Darussalam
    • Cambodia
    • China, People's Republic of
    • Cook Islands
    • Federated States of Micronesia
    • Fiji
    • Georgia
    • Hong Kong, China
    • India
    • Indonesia
    • Kazakhstan
    • Kiribati
    • Kyrgyz Republic
    • Lao People’s Democratic Republic
    • Malaysia
    • Maldives
    • Marshall Islands
    • Mongolia
    • Myanmar
    • Nauru
    • Nepal
    • Niue
    • Pakistan
    • Palau
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Philippines
    • Republic of Korea
    • Samoa
    • Singapore
    • Solomon Islands
    • Sri Lanka
    • Taipei,China
    • Tajikistan
    • Thailand
    • Timor-Leste
    • Tonga
    • Turkmenistan
    • Tuvalu
    • Uzbekistan
    • Vanuatu
    • Viet Nam
    • Australia
    • Japan
    • New Zealand
  • Sectors
    • Agriculture, natural resources, and rural development
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Finance
    • Health
    • Industry and trade
    • Information and communication technology
    • Multisector
    • Public sector management
    • Transport
    • Water and other urban infrastructure and services
  • Themes
    • Inclusive Economic Growth
    • Environmentally Sustainable Growth
    • Regional Integration
    • Private Sector Development
    • Governance and Capacity Development
    • Gender Equity and Mainstreaming
    • Knowledge Solutions
    • Partnerships
  • About
  • Home
  • Countries
  • Sectors
  • Themes
  • About

Search

Displaying 46 - 47 of 47

Lesson
The West Bengal state government’s experience in formulating and implementing MTEFs supports the view that these frameworks are valuable tools in helping governments translate development priorities into planned multiyear budget expenditures. Over time, MTEFs can contribute to the improvement of budget transparency, predictability, and expenditure efficiency.

Project Number: 49209-001
Project Name: Second West Bengal Development Finance Program
Report Date: 15 Feb 2021

Lesson
On the PBL design, the DMF should have identified the results of each policy action rather than adopting them as the output indicators. More rigor should be taken in selecting the outcome indicators. The indicators used for school attendance and dropout rates were neither appropriate to measure the result of the program nor its policy actions and suggest a weak design. Since the state is highly committed to pursuing the reforms, it could be argued that these reforms would have been carried out anyway by the government despite the program.

Project Number: 49209-001
Project Name: Second West Bengal Development Finance Program
Report Date: 15 Feb 2021

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Current page 4

Content type

  • Lesson (47)

Countries

  • Armenia (2)
  • Azerbaijan (2)
  • Cook Islands (3)
  • India (4)
  • Indonesia (9)
  • Kiribati (2)
  • Lao People’s Democratic Republic (6)
  • Nauru (3)
  • Pakistan (2)
  • Philippines (2)
  • Solomon Islands (2)
  • Tonga (3)
  • Tuvalu (2)
  • Uzbekistan (5)

Sectors

  • Public sector management (47)
    • (-) Public expenditure and fiscal management (47)
    • Public administration (5)
    • Economic affairs management (9)
    • Reforms of state owned enterprises (7)
    • Social protection initiatives (2)
  • Finance (4)
  • Health (3)

Themes

  • Inclusive Economic Growth (17)
  • Environmentally Sustainable Growth (4)
  • Regional Integration (6)
  • Private Sector Development (15)
  • Governance and Capacity Development (17)
  • Gender Equity and Mainstreaming (8)
  • Knowledge Solutions (8)
  • Partnerships (15)

Report Year

  • (-) 2021 (47)
  • 2024 (45)
  • 2023 (67)
  • 2022 (69)
  • 2020 (97)
  • 2019 (23)
  • 2018 (46)
  • 2017 (50)
  • 2016 (15)
  • 2015 (37)
  • 2014 (25)
  • 2013 (22)
  • 2012 (13)
  • 2011 (21)
  • 2010 (28)

Report Source

  • Self-evaluation (39)
  • Validation of self-evaluation (8)

Report Rating

  • Less than successful (2)
  • Successful (15)

Applicability

  • Country-level (8)
  • Program-level (4)
  • Project-level (23)
  • Results framework and methodology level (3)
  • Sector-level (7)

Topics

  • ADB policy/ procedural adjustments (1)
  • Contingent disaster financing (CDF) (1)
  • DMF (1)
  • DMF, Indicators (1)
  • DMF. Indicators (1)
  • Donor coordination (1)
  • EALs, Shelter provision (1)
  • Financial closing, EALs (1)
  • Gender (1)
  • Gender and disaster risk management (1)
  • Governance and public sector efficiency (1)
  • Implementation arrangement (1)
  • Implementation arrangement, Project staffing (1)
  • Policy-based lending (PBL) (2)
  • Programmatic approach to reforms (2)
  • Public sector management (PSM) reforms - Nauru (1)
  • Public sector reform outcomes (1)
  • Public sector reforms - Tuvalu (1)
  • Reform programs (3)
  • Reform programs, Subnational governments (1)
  • Reform programs and SDGs (1)
  • Regulatory impact assessment (1)
  • Stakeholder engagement (1)
  • TA, Emergency assistance loans (EALs) (1)
  • TA, Policy dialogue, Public expenditure management (1)
  • Technology upgrades - PFM (1)

Subscribe to our mailing list

6 ADB Avenue,
Mandaluyong City
1550, Metro Manila,
Philippines

 

Phone: +632 632 4444
Fax: +632 636 2444

Other ADB Websites

ADB Compliance Review Panel
Asia Pathways (ADBI Blog)
Asia Regional Integration Center
Asian Bonds Online
Asian Development Blog
Open Access Repository
Statistical Database System

IED Social Media

LinkedIn

Twitter

YouTube

©2024 Independent Evaluation - Asian Development Bank

Footer

  • About