Skip to main content
Evaluation Lessons
  • Home
  • Countries
    • Afghanistan
    • Armenia
    • Azerbaijan
    • Bangladesh
    • Bhutan
    • Brunei Darussalam
    • Cambodia
    • China, People's Republic of
    • Cook Islands
    • Federated States of Micronesia
    • Fiji
    • Georgia
    • Hong Kong, China
    • India
    • Indonesia
    • Kazakhstan
    • Kiribati
    • Kyrgyz Republic
    • Lao People’s Democratic Republic
    • Malaysia
    • Maldives
    • Marshall Islands
    • Mongolia
    • Myanmar
    • Nauru
    • Nepal
    • Niue
    • Pakistan
    • Palau
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Philippines
    • Republic of Korea
    • Samoa
    • Singapore
    • Solomon Islands
    • Sri Lanka
    • Taipei,China
    • Tajikistan
    • Thailand
    • Timor-Leste
    • Tonga
    • Turkmenistan
    • Tuvalu
    • Uzbekistan
    • Vanuatu
    • Viet Nam
    • Australia
    • Japan
    • New Zealand
  • Sectors
    • Agriculture, natural resources, and rural development
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Finance
    • Health
    • Industry and trade
    • Information and communication technology
    • Multisector
    • Public sector management
    • Transport
    • Water and other urban infrastructure and services
  • Themes
    • Inclusive Economic Growth
    • Environmentally Sustainable Growth
    • Regional Integration
    • Private Sector Development
    • Governance and Capacity Development
    • Gender Equity and Mainstreaming
    • Knowledge Solutions
    • Partnerships
  • About
  • Home
  • Countries
  • Sectors
  • Themes
  • About

Search

Displaying 1 - 1 of 1

Lesson
A more systematic tracking of performance across countries, which could build on new assessment frameworks developed under the Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) program in some areas of DRM, could enhance the innovations introduced by this program, particularly phasing of interventions and a differentiated approach that addresses the challenges of implementing planning, policy, and legal frameworks in fragile and conflict-affected situations (FCAS) and small island developing states (SIDS).

Project Number: 50028-001, 50028-002
Project Name: Pacific Disaster Resilience Program (Phases 1 and 2)
Report Date: 26 Dec 2023

Content type

  • Lesson (1)

Countries

  • Federated States of Micronesia (1)
  • Marshall Islands (1)
  • Solomon Islands (1)
  • Tonga (1)

Sectors

  • Public sector management (1)

Themes

Report Year

  • (-) 2023 (1)
  • 2022 (3)

Report Source

  • Self-evaluation (1)

Report Rating

  • Highly successful (1)

Applicability

  • Program-level (1)

Topics

  • Auditing (2)
  • Availability of baseline data (3)
  • Awareness and communication strategies (7)
  • Awareness and communication strategjes (1)
  • Awereness and communication strategies (1)
  • Beneficiary selection (1)
  • Beneficiary targeting (5)
  • Budgeting (23)
  • Bureaucratic structures (2)
  • Capacity developmen (1)
  • Capacity development (39)
  • Change in leadership (2)
  • Commitment and leadership (13)
  • Completion (1)
  • Coordination and engagement (6)
  • Country context (26)
  • Crosscutting issues and themes (1)
  • Culture, religion or ethnicity (1)
  • Data availability and baselines (18)
  • Disaster and Emergency Response (1)
  • Disasters (10)
  • Economc (1)
  • Economic (12)
  • Ecosystem (2)
  • Environment (1)
  • Environmental (17)
  • Environment and geography (2)
  • Envronmental (1)
  • Epidemics (12)
  • Finance and financial aspects (45)
  • Finance and financial resources (1)
  • Financial (36)
  • Financial and financial aspects (1)
  • Financial management and reporting (9)
  • Financing mechanism (2)
  • Gender (23)
  • Geographic access (2)
  • Implementation (1)
  • Indicators (45)
  • Institutional (86)
  • Instutional (1)
  • Inter and intra government relations (3)
  • Lack of commitment (2)
  • Lack of regulation or legislation (2)
  • Loan agreement (1)
  • Methodologies / approaches (99)
  • Methodologies and approaches (13)
  • Methologies / approaches (1)
  • Modality (27)
  • Monitoring and evaluation (86)
  • Natural disasters (7)
  • Organizational capacity (24)
  • Others (92)
  • Overambitious objectives (7)
  • Overambitious targets (1)
  • Pandemics (4)
  • Poject design (1)
  • Policy and reform (55)
  • Policyy and reform (1)
  • Political (3)
  • Political interference (1)
  • Procurement (37)
  • Project design (163)
  • Project management (28)
  • Projet management (1)
  • Reporting and suoervision (1)
  • Reporting and supervision (8)
  • Roles and responsibilities (11)
  • Sector issues (26)
  • Skilled human resoources (1)
  • Skilled human resources (24)
  • Skills transfer (1)
  • Social (26)
  • Staff turnover (4)
  • Staff turnovover (1)
  • Stakeholder engagement (78)
  • Stakeholder engagement Institutional (1)
  • Stakeholder involvement (1)
  • Stakeholder selection (12)
  • Technical (123)
  • Technical : Environment and geography (1)
  • Technical : Skilled human resources (1)
  • Time allocation or sequencing (1)
  • Time allocation or task sequencing (9)
  • Unsupportive legal and regulatory processes (2)
  • … (1)
  • (-) Natural disasters : Policy and reform (1)

Subscribe to our mailing list

6 ADB Avenue,
Mandaluyong City
1550, Metro Manila,
Philippines

 

Phone: +632 632 4444
Fax: +632 636 2444

Other ADB Websites

ADB Compliance Review Panel
Asia Pathways (ADBI Blog)
Asia Regional Integration Center
Asian Bonds Online
Asian Development Blog
Open Access Repository
Statistical Database System

IED Social Media

LinkedIn

Twitter

YouTube

©2024 Independent Evaluation - Asian Development Bank

Footer

  • About