Skip to main content
Evaluation Lessons
  • Home
  • Countries
    • Afghanistan
    • Armenia
    • Azerbaijan
    • Bangladesh
    • Bhutan
    • Brunei Darussalam
    • Cambodia
    • China, People's Republic of
    • Cook Islands
    • Federated States of Micronesia
    • Fiji
    • Georgia
    • Hong Kong, China
    • India
    • Indonesia
    • Kazakhstan
    • Kiribati
    • Kyrgyz Republic
    • Lao People’s Democratic Republic
    • Malaysia
    • Maldives
    • Marshall Islands
    • Mongolia
    • Myanmar
    • Nauru
    • Nepal
    • Niue
    • Pakistan
    • Palau
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Philippines
    • Republic of Korea
    • Samoa
    • Singapore
    • Solomon Islands
    • Sri Lanka
    • Taipei,China
    • Tajikistan
    • Thailand
    • Timor-Leste
    • Tonga
    • Turkmenistan
    • Tuvalu
    • Uzbekistan
    • Vanuatu
    • Viet Nam
    • Australia
    • Japan
    • New Zealand
  • Sectors
    • Agriculture, natural resources, and rural development
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Finance
    • Health
    • Industry and trade
    • Information and communication technology
    • Multisector
    • Public sector management
    • Transport
    • Water and other urban infrastructure and services
  • Themes
    • Inclusive Economic Growth
    • Environmentally Sustainable Growth
    • Regional Integration
    • Private Sector Development
    • Governance and Capacity Development
    • Gender Equity and Mainstreaming
    • Knowledge Solutions
    • Partnerships
  • About
  • Home
  • Countries
  • Sectors
  • Themes
  • About

Search

Displaying 76 - 77 of 77

Lesson
Monitoring and evaluation framework. The overall success of the EAPCR could have been greater had the DMF been better designed. The impact statement could have been closer to the outcome, and assumptions about investor and consumer confidence should have been more realistic. The impact statement could have focused on maintaining sustainable and inclusive public sector spending rather than to restore the Georgian economy to the pre-war trajectory of growth and social development.

Project Number: 42477-013
Project Name: Emergency Assistance for Post-Conflict Recovery
Report Date: 01 Dec 2010

Lesson
Lending Modality: Having an appropriate modality is critical. ADB's Disaster and Emergency Assistance Policy together with Achieving Development Effectiveness in Weakly Performing Countries provided a ready framework for Emergency Assistance for Post-Conflict Recovery (EAPCR).

Project Number: 42477-013
Project Name: Emergency Assistance for Post-Conflict Recovery
Report Date: 01 Dec 2010

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Current page 6

Content type

  • Lesson (77)

Countries

  • Afghanistan (8)
  • Armenia (9)
  • Azerbaijan (15)
  • Bangladesh (1)
  • Bhutan (15)
  • China, People's Republic of (8)
  • Cook Islands (2)
  • Georgia (24)
  • Kazakhstan (8)
  • Kyrgyz Republic (22)
  • Mongolia (8)
  • Pakistan (8)
  • Tajikistan (11)
  • Turkmenistan (8)
  • Uzbekistan (8)
  • Vanuatu (2)

Sectors

  • (-) Finance (77)
    • Central banking systems (5)
    • Banking systems and nonbank financial institutions (13)
    • Small and medium enterprise finance and leasing (22)
    • Inclusive finance (25)
    • Insurance and contractual savings (19)
    • Money and capital markets (35)
    • Infrastructure finance and investment funds (7)
    • Finance sector development (37)
  • Public sector management (77)
    • (-) Public expenditure and fiscal management (77)
    • Public administration (3)
    • Economic affairs management (15)
    • Reforms of state owned enterprises (8)
    • Law and judiciary (14)
    • Social protection initiatives (10)
  • Education (20)
  • Industry and trade (18)
  • Health (13)
  • Agriculture, natural resources, and rural development (6)

Themes

  • Inclusive Economic Growth (47)
  • Regional Integration (14)
  • Private Sector Development (39)
  • Governance and Capacity Development (46)
  • Gender Equity and Mainstreaming (31)
  • Knowledge Solutions (23)
  • Partnerships (9)

Report Year

  • 2024 (16)
  • 2023 (8)
  • 2022 (6)
  • 2021 (4)
  • 2020 (2)
  • 2019 (5)
  • 2018 (9)
  • 2017 (2)
  • 2016 (2)
  • 2015 (11)
  • 2013 (6)
  • 2012 (1)
  • 2011 (3)
  • 2010 (2)

Report Source

  • Self-evaluation (52)
  • Validation of self-evaluation (17)
  • Technical assistance completion reports (8)

Report Rating

  • Highly successful (4)
  • Less than successful (8)
  • Successful (61)

Applicability

  • Country-level (9)
  • Program-level (12)
  • Project-level (4)
  • Results framework and methodology level (3)
  • Sector-level (8)

Topics

  • Awareness and communication strategies (2)
  • Capacity development (1)
  • Commitment and leadership (1)
  • Data availability and baselines (4)
  • Disasters (1)
  • DMF. Indicators (1)
  • Epidemics (3)
  • Finance and financial aspects (3)
  • Financial (1)
  • Financing mechanism (3)
  • Gender (3)
  • Governance and public sector efficiency (1)
  • Indicators (4)
  • Institutional (3)
  • Lack of commitment (1)
  • Methodologies / approaches (5)
  • Methodologies and approaches (1)
  • Modality (2)
  • Monitoring and evaluation (6)
  • Natural disasters (2)
  • Organizational capacity (1)
  • Policy and reform (8)
  • Political interference (1)
  • Procurement (1)
  • Programmatic approach to reforms (2)
  • Project design (18)
  • Sector issues (3)
  • Skilled human resources (2)
  • Stakeholder engagement (3)
  • Technical (1)
  • Time allocation or task sequencing (2)
  • Voice and accountability (1)

Subscribe to our mailing list

6 ADB Avenue,
Mandaluyong City
1550, Metro Manila,
Philippines

 

Phone: +632 632 4444
Fax: +632 636 2444

Other ADB Websites

ADB Compliance Review Panel
Asia Pathways (ADBI Blog)
Asia Regional Integration Center
Asian Bonds Online
Asian Development Blog
Open Access Repository
Statistical Database System

IED Social Media

LinkedIn

Twitter

YouTube

©2024 Independent Evaluation - Asian Development Bank

Footer

  • About