Skip to main content
Evaluation Lessons
  • Home
  • Countries
    • Afghanistan
    • Armenia
    • Azerbaijan
    • Bangladesh
    • Bhutan
    • Brunei Darussalam
    • Cambodia
    • China, People's Republic of
    • Cook Islands
    • Federated States of Micronesia
    • Fiji
    • Georgia
    • Hong Kong, China
    • India
    • Indonesia
    • Kazakhstan
    • Kiribati
    • Kyrgyz Republic
    • Lao People’s Democratic Republic
    • Malaysia
    • Maldives
    • Marshall Islands
    • Mongolia
    • Myanmar
    • Nauru
    • Nepal
    • Niue
    • Pakistan
    • Palau
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Philippines
    • Republic of Korea
    • Samoa
    • Singapore
    • Solomon Islands
    • Sri Lanka
    • Taipei,China
    • Tajikistan
    • Thailand
    • Timor-Leste
    • Tonga
    • Turkmenistan
    • Tuvalu
    • Uzbekistan
    • Vanuatu
    • Viet Nam
    • Australia
    • Japan
    • New Zealand
  • Sectors
    • Agriculture, natural resources, and rural development
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Finance
    • Health
    • Industry and trade
    • Information and communication technology
    • Multisector
    • Public sector management
    • Transport
    • Water and other urban infrastructure and services
  • Themes
    • Inclusive Economic Growth
    • Environmentally Sustainable Growth
    • Regional Integration
    • Private Sector Development
    • Governance and Capacity Development
    • Gender Equity and Mainstreaming
    • Knowledge Solutions
    • Partnerships
  • About
  • Home
  • Countries
  • Sectors
  • Themes
  • About

Search

Displaying 1 - 2 of 2

Lesson
The program did not give sufficient emphasis to ethnicity and included no specific ethnicity expertise even though ethnic students were the main project beneficiaries. A detailed analysis of different ethnic minority areas would have yielded a fuller understanding of the factors influencing education choices and outcomes. Inclusion of specialistsin the program team could have deepened the analysis in EGP, strengthened the engagement of ethnic groups, and likely strengthened outcomes for ethnic communities

Project Number: 40368-022
Project Name: Secondary
Education Sector Development Program
Report Date: 21 Apr 2022

Lesson
The series of interlinked sector development programs operating with the framework of the government’s education sector policies and plans has proven effective in supporting government secondary education reforms. This long-term approach has provided consistent support and certainty to a long and complex reform agenda that successfully extended the secondary school cycle while simultaneously supporting broadened access and improved quality and efficiency.

Project Number: 40368-022
Project Name: Secondary
Education Sector Development Program
Report Date: 21 Apr 2022

Content type

  • Lesson (2)

Countries

  • Lao People’s Democratic Republic (2)

Sectors

  • (-) Education (2)
    • (-) Secondary - social protection initiatives (2)
    • Secondary (2)
    • Education sector development (2)

Themes

  • Inclusive Economic Growth (2)
  • Governance and Capacity Development (2)
  • Gender Equity and Mainstreaming (2)

Report Year

  • 2022 (2)

Report Source

  • Validation of self-evaluation (2)

Report Rating

  • Successful (2)

Applicability

  • Project-level (1)
  • Sector-level (1)

Topics

  • Financial (1)
  • GAP (1)
  • Leadership development (1)
  • Modality (1)
  • Monitoring and evaluation (2)
  • Secondary education (1)
  • (-) Project design (2)

Subscribe to our mailing list

6 ADB Avenue,
Mandaluyong City
1550, Metro Manila,
Philippines

 

Phone: +632 632 4444
Fax: +632 636 2444

Other ADB Websites

ADB Compliance Review Panel
Asia Pathways (ADBI Blog)
Asia Regional Integration Center
Asian Bonds Online
Asian Development Blog
Open Access Repository
Statistical Database System

IED Social Media

LinkedIn

Twitter

YouTube

©2024 Independent Evaluation - Asian Development Bank

Footer

  • About