Skip to main content
Evaluation Lessons
Toggle navigation
Home
Countries
Afghanistan
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Bangladesh
Bhutan
Brunei Darussalam
Cambodia
China, People's Republic of
Cook Islands
Federated States of Micronesia
Fiji
Georgia
Hong Kong, China
India
Indonesia
Kazakhstan
Kiribati
Kyrgyz Republic
Lao People’s Democratic Republic
Malaysia
Maldives
Marshall Islands
Mongolia
Myanmar
Nauru
Nepal
Niue
Pakistan
Palau
Papua New Guinea
Philippines
Republic of Korea
Samoa
Singapore
Solomon Islands
Sri Lanka
Taipei,China
Tajikistan
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Tonga
Turkmenistan
Tuvalu
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Viet Nam
Australia
Japan
New Zealand
Sectors
Agriculture, natural resources, and rural development
Education
Energy
Finance
Health
Industry and trade
Information and communication technology
Multisector
Public sector management
Transport
Water and other urban infrastructure and services
Themes
Inclusive Economic Growth
Environmentally Sustainable Growth
Regional Integration
Private Sector Development
Governance and Capacity Development
Gender Equity and Mainstreaming
Knowledge Solutions
Partnerships
About
Home
Countries
Sectors
Themes
About
Search
Displaying 136 - 136 of 136
Lesson
Impact indicators in the results framework need to have casual connection to the program’s outputs and outcomes. The civil service and budgetary reforms supported by the program will contribute to more efficient public administration and budget expenditures over time. However, they can only contribute at the margin to poverty and maternal mortality reduction, which were the impact indicators for the program. These indicators were not aligned with the impact statement, which aimed for improved service delivery.
Project Number:
46059-001, 46059-002
Project Name:
Governance and Capacity Development in Public Sector Management Program - Subprogram 2
Report Date:
04 Apr 2022
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
2
Page
3
Page
4
Page
5
Page
6
Page
7
Page
8
Page
9
Current page
10