Skip to main content
Evaluation Lessons
Toggle navigation
Home
Countries
Afghanistan
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Bangladesh
Bhutan
Brunei Darussalam
Cambodia
China, People's Republic of
Cook Islands
Federated States of Micronesia
Fiji
Georgia
Hong Kong, China
India
Indonesia
Kazakhstan
Kiribati
Kyrgyz Republic
Lao People’s Democratic Republic
Malaysia
Maldives
Marshall Islands
Mongolia
Myanmar
Nauru
Nepal
Niue
Pakistan
Palau
Papua New Guinea
Philippines
Republic of Korea
Samoa
Singapore
Solomon Islands
Sri Lanka
Taipei,China
Tajikistan
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Tonga
Turkmenistan
Tuvalu
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Viet Nam
Australia
Japan
New Zealand
Sectors
Agriculture, natural resources, and rural development
Education
Energy
Finance
Health
Industry and trade
Information and communication technology
Multisector
Public sector management
Transport
Water and other urban infrastructure and services
Themes
Inclusive Economic Growth
Environmentally Sustainable Growth
Regional Integration
Private Sector Development
Governance and Capacity Development
Gender Equity and Mainstreaming
Knowledge Solutions
Partnerships
About
Home
Countries
Sectors
Themes
About
Search
Displaying 16 - 17 of 17
Lesson
Although the initiatives under the project were largely complementary, each project output required a distinctly different knowledge base and skill set in consulting services. However, output 2, suboutput 2 made use of three consulting packages, involving a consulting firm and two individual consultants. While the use of two individual consultants was deemed the most economical approach at the time of inception, their deliverables overlapped somewhat and could possibly have been consolidated in one contract package to improve overall project management.
Project Number:
41149-013
Project Name:
Private Sector Development Project
Report Date:
01 Aug 2014
Lesson
Considering the broad scope of the project and the capacity constraints of the Ministry of Finance and Treasury and the implementing agencies, implementation might have benefitted from more extensive monitoring and more frequent reviews, as well as the establishment of a project performance and monitoring system. By the time of the midterm review - 17 months behind schedule, in March 2012 - only 75% of contract awards were complete and disbursements stood at only 54%.
Project Number:
41149-013
Project Name:
Private Sector Development Project
Report Date:
01 Aug 2014
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
Page
1
Current page
2