Skip to main content
Evaluation Lessons
  • Home
  • Countries
    • Afghanistan
    • Armenia
    • Azerbaijan
    • Bangladesh
    • Bhutan
    • Brunei Darussalam
    • Cambodia
    • China, People's Republic of
    • Cook Islands
    • Federated States of Micronesia
    • Fiji
    • Georgia
    • Hong Kong, China
    • India
    • Indonesia
    • Kazakhstan
    • Kiribati
    • Kyrgyz Republic
    • Lao People’s Democratic Republic
    • Malaysia
    • Maldives
    • Marshall Islands
    • Mongolia
    • Myanmar
    • Nauru
    • Nepal
    • Niue
    • Pakistan
    • Palau
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Philippines
    • Republic of Korea
    • Samoa
    • Singapore
    • Solomon Islands
    • Sri Lanka
    • Taipei,China
    • Tajikistan
    • Thailand
    • Timor-Leste
    • Tonga
    • Turkmenistan
    • Tuvalu
    • Uzbekistan
    • Vanuatu
    • Viet Nam
    • Australia
    • Japan
    • New Zealand
  • Sectors
    • Agriculture, natural resources, and rural development
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Finance
    • Health
    • Industry and trade
    • Information and communication technology
    • Multisector
    • Public sector management
    • Transport
    • Water and other urban infrastructure and services
  • Themes
    • Inclusive Economic Growth
    • Environmentally Sustainable Growth
    • Regional Integration
    • Private Sector Development
    • Governance and Capacity Development
    • Gender Equity and Mainstreaming
    • Knowledge Solutions
    • Partnerships
  • About
  • Home
  • Countries
  • Sectors
  • Themes
  • About

Search

Displaying 16 - 17 of 17

Lesson
Although the initiatives under the project were largely complementary, each project output required a distinctly different knowledge base and skill set in consulting services. However, output 2, suboutput 2 made use of three consulting packages, involving a consulting firm and two individual consultants. While the use of two individual consultants was deemed the most economical approach at the time of inception, their deliverables overlapped somewhat and could possibly have been consolidated in one contract package to improve overall project management.

Project Number: 41149-013
Project Name: Private Sector Development Project
Report Date: 01 Aug 2014

Lesson
Considering the broad scope of the project and the capacity constraints of the Ministry of Finance and Treasury and the implementing agencies, implementation might have benefitted from more extensive monitoring and more frequent reviews, as well as the establishment of a project performance and monitoring system. By the time of the midterm review - 17 months behind schedule, in March 2012 - only 75% of contract awards were complete and disbursements stood at only 54%.

Project Number: 41149-013
Project Name: Private Sector Development Project
Report Date: 01 Aug 2014

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • Page 1
  • Current page 2

Content type

  • Lesson (17)

Countries

  • (-) Maldives (17)
  • Afghanistan (20)
  • Armenia (5)
  • Azerbaijan (23)
  • Bangladesh (22)
  • Bhutan (27)
  • Brunei Darussalam (27)
  • Cambodia (58)
  • China, People's Republic of (72)
  • Georgia (20)
  • India (29)
  • Indonesia (42)
  • Kazakhstan (29)
  • Kyrgyz Republic (36)
  • Lao People’s Democratic Republic (67)
  • Malaysia (27)
  • Mongolia (31)
  • Myanmar (40)
  • Nepal (23)
  • Pakistan (35)
  • Papua New Guinea (8)
  • Philippines (36)
  • Republic of Korea (27)
  • Samoa (7)
  • Singapore (27)
  • Sri Lanka (7)
  • Tajikistan (27)
  • Thailand (40)
  • Turkmenistan (20)
  • Uzbekistan (23)
  • Viet Nam (59)
  • Australia (14)
  • Japan (27)
  • New Zealand (14)

Sectors

  • (-) Industry and trade (17)
    • Small and medium enterprise development (17)

Themes

  • Inclusive Economic Growth (17)
  • Private Sector Development (17)
  • Governance and Capacity Development (17)
  • Gender Equity and Mainstreaming (6)
  • Partnerships (6)

Report Year

  • 2020 (2)
  • 2019 (4)
  • 2015 (1)
  • 2014 (10)

Report Source

  • Self-evaluation (14)
  • Validation of self-evaluation (3)

Report Rating

  • Successful (17)

Applicability

Topics

Subscribe to our mailing list

6 ADB Avenue,
Mandaluyong City
1550, Metro Manila,
Philippines

 

Phone: +632 632 4444
Fax: +632 636 2444

Other ADB Websites

ADB Compliance Review Panel
Asia Pathways (ADBI Blog)
Asia Regional Integration Center
Asian Bonds Online
Asian Development Blog
Open Access Repository
Statistical Database System

IED Social Media

LinkedIn

Twitter

YouTube

©2024 Independent Evaluation - Asian Development Bank

Footer

  • About