Search

Displaying 1 - 15 of 36

Lesson
Strong government commitment and leadership is critical to the implementation of reforms. In this project, this enabled the successful implementation of policy actions and reforms agreed under the post-program partnership framework (P3F). The single-tranche, stand-alone modality combined with the P3F was useful in bridging a period of high uncertainty, continuing and building on reforms from the previous programmatic approach while providing flexibility to reflect the new government’s priorities in a follow-on medium-term reform program.

Project Number: 55116-001
Project Name: Sustainable and Resilient Recovery Program
Report Date:
Lesson
A combination of policy-based lending (PBL) and technical assistance (TA) engagement, based on ADB's differentiated approach in small island developing states (SIDS), can further enhance the impact of ADB assistance to public sector management in Fiji. The design of this reflected ADB's differentiated approach in SIDS, spreading reforms across complementary areas and government units while combining policy actions that introduce or advance policy and legal frameworks with those that support their implementation.

Project Number: 55116-001
Project Name: Sustainable and Resilient Recovery Program
Report Date:
Lesson
Continuous and consistent technical assistance (TA) is crucial to the successful implementation of reform programs and sustainability of the reform process. This program is built on the long-term engagement of ADB and development partners in Fiji. It therefore benefited from extensive TA in public sector management, reforms introduced through the previous PBL, and project investments in the water and energy sectors.

Project Number: 55116-001
Project Name: Sustainable and Resilient Recovery Program
Report Date:
Lesson
Project management and supervision key to success. When a project includes components with high level of implementation uncertainties, adequate provision for project management and supervision could help to mitigate the risks. While beyond the control of the project, the frequent turnover of key officials in the PRM agencies and national political changes affected continuity of the project implementation.

Project Number: 38356-013
Project Name: Fiscal Management Efficiency Project
Report Date:
Lesson
Instead of implementing 13 modules sequentially across all government spending agencies, it could be more suitable to do it in a phased manner: implement each module, test and finalize for one agency, and then replicate to others. The demand on staff time and efforts in a modular approach would have been more manageable, and quick successes would have helped sustain morale and commitment.

Project Number: 38356-013
Project Name: Fiscal Management Efficiency Project
Report Date:
Lesson
Due consideration to realistic timeline and risk mitigation. The project was designed to be completed in 4 years but after 10 years, it is still incomplete. The timeline of 4 years at appraisal seems over-optimistic. In particular, the following factors should also be considered in this type of projects: (i) bridging language barriers, (ii) knowledge of local accounting regulations, and (iii) adequacy of locally based technical staff. Assessment of these factors and incorporation of corresponding risk-mitigation measures could help minimize delays in project implementation.

Project Number: 38356-013
Project Name: Fiscal Management Efficiency Project
Report Date:
Lesson
Extra attention needed for project implementation involving large-scale activities for information and communication technology. A distinct feature of the project is the implementation of two large-scale ICT-related components, RAMIS and ITMIS. Compared to hard infrastructure projects, the project involved less well-defined activities for system customization, configuration, re-development and testing, which usually require adequate implementation time to ensure the quality of final products.

Project Number: 38356-013
Project Name: Fiscal Management Efficiency Project
Report Date:
Lesson
Sustained ownership of and commitment to tax administration-related activities. Tax administration modernization typically has one key stakeholder and one key objective of increasing tax revenues, which is a tangible gain. In contrast, PFM modernization has many key players and the benefits of more efficient PFM, in the form of reduced administrative costs, are less tangible. In this project, the RAMIS component demonstrated better performance than the ITMIS component.

Project Number: 38356-013
Project Name: Fiscal Management Efficiency Project
Report Date:
Lesson
Expertise in information and communication technology key for public financial management projects. On support from ADB during loan processing and administration, a strong One-ADB team could provide timely advice to the government, the consultants, and the contractors on implementation. Such a team should comprise members with expertise in key subjects. In this project, an ICT expert could help the executing agency’s project preparation and implementation at the early stage.

Project Number: 38356-013
Project Name: Fiscal Management Efficiency Project
Report Date:
Lesson
Early engagement with ADB project teams to frame projects as climate relevant, as well as early engagement with external climate finance providers facilitated mobilization of timely resources—this lesson on early and proactive engagement is generalizable for implementation and delivery. Although it may be inferred, no clear evidence is provided for the value added of promoting knowledge exchange among DMCs.

Project Number: 47286-001
Project Name: Enhancing Readiness of ADB Developing Member Countries for Scaled Up Climate Finance
Report Date:
Lesson
The TCR mentioned the usefulness of a flexible approach to drafting consultant’s terms of reference such that they are broad based—this is a generalizable lesson in managing staff and consultant resources, and useful in the context of limited availability of climate finance specialists.

Project Number: 47286-001
Project Name: Enhancing Readiness of ADB Developing Member Countries for Scaled Up Climate Finance
Report Date:
Lesson
The TCR found that close interaction between DMC stakeholders and climate finance providers was essential to create buy-in from all parties. The TCR did not provide evidence or data to support the level of adoption or commitment to TA efforts, or other evidence of continuing action and sustainability after TA completion.

Project Number: 47286-001
Project Name: Enhancing Readiness of ADB Developing Member Countries for Scaled Up Climate Finance
Report Date:
Lesson
The TCR did not mention this dimension explicitly in the document. In-country ownership by government and/or private sector would be required to consolidate gains.

Project Number: 47286-001
Project Name: Enhancing Readiness of ADB Developing Member Countries for Scaled Up Climate Finance
Report Date:
Lesson
Replication: Within ADB, the SDCD cost center has been established to develop GCF project proposals. Scaling up: It would require additional project preparation facilities, trust fund resources, and climate TA projects alongside ADB projects. Skills within SDCD have been developed but continue to rely on TA consultant support for implementation. The TCR, thus, recommended for a way forward.

Project Number: 47286-001
Project Name: Enhancing Readiness of ADB Developing Member Countries for Scaled Up Climate Finance
Report Date:
Lesson
Based on the TCR narrative, the TA prepared some technical documents and accessed new mechanisms for climate finance. The approved GCF proposals were examples. While the TA made some efforts to increase awareness and disseminate knowledge via the in-country consultations, there was no clear evidence or assessment that the target audience was more aware of the technical materials presented, and had adopted the same, thereby, building institutional capacity. Adopting national or sectoral policies or legal standards, or any academic literature was not mentioned in the TCR.

Project Number: 47286-001
Project Name: Enhancing Readiness of ADB Developing Member Countries for Scaled Up Climate Finance
Report Date: