Search

Displaying 1 - 15 of 26

Lesson
Development partners, such as the World Bank, Australian Department of Foreign Affairs, and United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), have been working alongside ADB in supporting the 4Ps program that has led the Department of Social Welfare and Development to request for joint review missions.

Project Number: 43407-013
Project Name: Social Protection Support Project
Report Date:
Lesson
The Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) program did not increase the number of children fully immunized before 1 year of age or collect complete data during the impact evaluation rounds on the share of beneficiary children aged 6–14 years of age who were working. It is recommended that future support to the 4Ps program include technical assistance to support the government to identify key issues preventing immunization before 1 year of age and ensure robust M&E of children’s attendance in school and participation in work and labor activities.

Project Number: 43407-013
Project Name: Social Protection Support Project
Report Date:
Lesson
The absence of a project performance management system (PPMS) could create difficulties in providing basis for the estimation of a project’s economic benefits. Therefore, a well-functioning PPMS helps provide data for more accurate EIRR estimates and the development impacts of road projects.

Project Number: 41076-044
Project Name: Road Improvement and Institutional Development Project
Report Date:
Lesson
More careful assessment of results of institutional capacity reviews during project processing could avoid major revision of project components dealing with institutional capacity.

Project Number: 41076-044
Project Name: Road Improvement and Institutional Development Project
Report Date:
Lesson
Project implementation highlights the importance of increased accountability and ownership by all stakeholders in achieving the project’s intended outcome. This, along with a well-designed capacity building intervention for implementing agencies, would help facilitate timely implementation and achievement of project results. Complex projects with many components and a wide geographical coverage require a high level of government commitment and ownership.

Project Number: 37749-013
Project Name: Agrarian Reform Communities Project II
Report Date:
Lesson
Ensuring that an acceptable cost-sharing arrangement is in place at the outset, prior to project launch, can help minimize project risks. The rural infrastructure component comprising 80% of total actual project cost was not achieved largely as the LGUs were unable to raise the required counterpart contributions. Moreover, it is essential that appropriate due diligence and risk assessment are undertaken and that risk mitigation measures concerning the financial capability of participating local governments are identified at the outset.

Project Number: 37749-013
Project Name: Agrarian Reform Communities Project II
Report Date:
Lesson
Output performance measures of public sector and management programs could be improved through the inclusion of (1) anti-corruption measures, especially if the risk of corruption is high in the program and the country rates poorly on perceptions of corruption; and (2) strengthened internal and external audit functions to provide more transparency and accountability to government processes.

Project Number: 44253-016
Project Name: Local Government Finance and Fiscal Decentralization Program
Report Date:
Lesson
The impact level of the DMF could be connected to the results chain.

Project Number: 44253-016
Project Name: Local Government Finance and Fiscal Decentralization Program
Report Date:
Lesson
Public sector finance and management programs could use information on transparency and accountability of government administration from government institutions such as the Commission on Audit when designing and evaluating programs.

Project Number: 44253-016
Project Name: Local Government Finance and Fiscal Decentralization Program
Report Date:
Lesson
It is important to have a clear results chain logic at design in order to extract valuable lessons from the project.

Project Number: 33276-013
Project Name: Integrated Coastal Resources Management Project
Report Date:
Lesson
Adopting a phased approach in one or two provinces, which could then be scaled up to other areas, would avoid wide geographical dispersion and the challenges of implementing and coordinating activities.

Project Number: 33276-013
Project Name: Integrated Coastal Resources Management Project
Report Date:
Lesson
Conductingan in-depth context and institutional analysis up front is important to the design and allocation of project resources .

Project Number: 33276-013
Project Name: Integrated Coastal Resources Management Project
Report Date:
Lesson
Sustainable resource management requires actions beyond developing a regulatory framework; adequate institutional capacity, coordination among different agencies and levels of government, sufficient resources to generate information on the status of coastal resources and effectively enforce regulations and plans, and the involvement of local stakeholders are also required.

Project Number: 33276-013
Project Name: Integrated Coastal Resources Management Project
Report Date:
Lesson
Valid control groups should also be identified to the extent possible to measure benefits attributable to the project.

Project Number: 33276-013
Project Name: Integrated Coastal Resources Management Project
Report Date:
Lesson
The approach to risk assessment and risk management should be consistent across programs. Risk assessments should include the individual risk and its risk level before mitigation, the mitigation strategies and resultant risk to each risk and to the overall risk after mitigation. The PCR template should also allow for discussion on risk to explicitly consider whether the risk mitigation strategies had been successful.

Project Number: 41380-013, 41380-023
Project Name: Governance in Justice Sector Reform Program
Report Date: