Search

Displaying 1 - 15 of 20

Lesson
For future projects located on numerous outer islands, formalized feedback channels from local island development committees (IDCs) to the IA should be established as part of project design.

Project Number: 32036-013
Project Name: Outer Islands Electrification (Sector) Project
Report Date:
Lesson
No new lessons

Project Number: 31324-013
Project Name: State Power Sector Reform Project
Report Date:
Lesson
Passing the Cooperative Societies Act, the necessary enabling legislation before subproject loan agreements were possible, was known at project approval to be the responsibility of Parliament and therefore something the government could guarantee. Yet project formulation as set out in the report and recommendation of the President (RRP) implicitly assumed that this legislation would be passed in a timely manner and offered no robust contingency plan should the legal entities to operate subprojects fail to materialize.

Project Number: 32036-013
Project Name: Outer Islands Electrification (Sector) Project
Report Date:
Lesson
No new lessons

Project Number: 30207-013, 30207-023
Project Name: Power Sector Development Program
Report Date:
Lesson
In formulating similar loan projects, ADB should ensure to the extent possible that achieving outputs is within the grasp of the implementing agency (IA). Depending on the Ministry of Planning and National Development (MPND), an agency without a stake in the subprojects, to spearhead the benefit and poverty monitoring and evaluation (BPME) proved problematic, as its withdrawal from that commitment left the IA unable to complete that part of the project.

Project Number: 32036-013
Project Name: Outer Islands Electrification (Sector) Project
Report Date:
Lesson
No new lessons

Project Number: 38458-013
Project Name: Infrastructure Development
Report Date:
Lesson
There are underlying systemic challenges associated with project implementation on the outer islands of the Maldives that must be considered in project design, as these conditions are different from those of other South Asian developing member countries. First, direct project oversight is more difficult because of transport issues unique to the archipelago. (Many outer islands are remote, with transport by lengthy, infrequent, and irregularly scheduled boat trips.

Project Number: 32036-013
Project Name: Outer Islands Electrification (Sector) Project
Report Date:
Lesson
Forming separate, miniature utility cooperatives on individual islands with an average population of only 1,511 people, each with a separate loan agreement and inspector, proved very difficult to implement. This suggests that one island is too small a unit to justify this approach. The availability of technical expertise on each island varies significantly, and the requisite financial-management and tariff-setting expertise is scarce.

Project Number: 32036-013
Project Name: Outer Islands Electrification (Sector) Project
Report Date:
Lesson
No new lessons

Project Number: 36318-013, 36318-023
Project Name: Assam Power Sector Development Program
Report Date:
Lesson
ADB must supervise an IA more effectively if it has not established a prior record of successfully managing ADB-funded projects. ADB review missions throughout the project noted early warning signs that the project faced difficulties. More proactive and decisive action by ADB might have effected more efficient implementation. For example, when it became apparent that legislation would be delayed, ADB could have engaged the government to discuss an acceptable alternative, rather than simply leave it to a review mission to urge the government to take unspecified corrective action.

Project Number: 32036-013
Project Name: Outer Islands Electrification (Sector) Project
Report Date:
Lesson
Island selection and subproject appraisal were inefficient, delaying the commencement of contract processing by over 2 years and suggesting a recommendation for altering the approach that is shown in the next section.

Project Number: 32036-013
Project Name: Outer Islands Electrification (Sector) Project
Report Date:
Lesson
A notable feature of this project was the difference in the performance of the batch 1 and batch 2 contractors, though both contracts were undertaken by the same consortium. The main difference was in project management requirements.

Project Number: 32036-013
Project Name: Outer Islands Electrification (Sector) Project
Report Date:
Lesson
While the project-preparation facilities made sense, the TA loan itself was spread too thinly. The funds were dispersed across three sectors, and were handled by numerous agencies managing subprojects in many locations. This made coordination a challenge right from the outset, especially given the absence of an experienced and capable local coordination team. It did not work. In retrospect, the multi-sector design of the TA was wrong, and approval should not be given for similar TA loans in the future. The important lesson learned here is to restrict loans to one sector at a time.

Project Number: 38458-013
Project Name: Infrastructure Development
Report Date:
Lesson
ADB should have restructured its technical assistance (TA) loan much earlier, taking into account two events: (i) the approval of new multitranche financing facilities (MFFs) with project-preparation components that duplicated some of the TA's work, and (ii) dramatic changes in the economy that made some subprojects irrelevant and/or unfundable. The review missions reported on consultant services and their performance, and they did propose a major restructuring of the TA over time.

Project Number: 38458-013
Project Name: Infrastructure Development
Report Date:
Lesson
The Planning and Development Division's (PDD lack of capacity to assist the implementing agencies delayed the issuance of consultant mandates, thus slowing down work on some priority subprojects. The choice of the PDD as the executing agency was a mistake. The PDD lacked qualified staff,, access, and a track record. The setting up of new units to manage consultancy contracts does not work and should not have been proposed in the first place.

Project Number: 38458-013
Project Name: Infrastructure Development
Report Date: